WHY are American citizens being forced to contribute to organizations LIKE "LA RAZA," that are threatening the overthrow of the American Southwest?
"La Raza" is made up of many immigrant groups that aim to abolish all immigration laws and teach "La Reconquista" in schools to Latino students. In essence, students are taught that Europe STOLE southwest America from Mexico and that this region must be "conquered." ...and YOUR TAX DOLLARS are paying for their activities!
http://conservativeactionalerts.com/blog_post/show/2538
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
NCFRW SPONSORING LEGISLATIVE DAY IN RALEIGH!
LEGISLATIVE DAY TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2011
Wear RED!
10:00 a.m. Meet in the Legislative Building lobby at 16 West Jones St., Raleigh
10:30 a.m. Attend the Marriage Rally behind the Legislative Building
Speaker is Dr. David Gibbs Jr, Christian Law Association founder
11:30 a.m. Lunch is a box/bag 6" sub with chips, cookie and drink *
12:00 p.m. - 2 p.m. Meet with legislators and present "Marriage Amendment" petitions in
the Legislative Building auditorium
*Lunch is $10 and reservations are needed by Wednesday, May 11th via Email: nc.eagle.eye@live.com. The money will be collected on May 17th and cash is preferred.
Point of Contact: Brenda T. Formo
(336) 605-5848 (home)
(336) 337-9190 (cell)
Rally for Marriage on May 17th Sponsored by Return America --to express support for a constitutional amendment to preserve marriage in North Carolina. http://www.ncfpc.org/stories/110506s2.html
Wear RED!
10:00 a.m. Meet in the Legislative Building lobby at 16 West Jones St., Raleigh
10:30 a.m. Attend the Marriage Rally behind the Legislative Building
Speaker is Dr. David Gibbs Jr, Christian Law Association founder
11:30 a.m. Lunch is a box/bag 6" sub with chips, cookie and drink *
12:00 p.m. - 2 p.m. Meet with legislators and present "Marriage Amendment" petitions in
the Legislative Building auditorium
*Lunch is $10 and reservations are needed by Wednesday, May 11th via Email: nc.eagle.eye@live.com. The money will be collected on May 17th and cash is preferred.
Point of Contact: Brenda T. Formo
(336) 605-5848 (home)
(336) 337-9190 (cell)
Rally for Marriage on May 17th Sponsored by Return America --to express support for a constitutional amendment to preserve marriage in North Carolina. http://www.ncfpc.org/stories/110506s2.html
Monday, May 9, 2011
URGENT: NCFIRE-Action Alert
We need our members to contact the NC General Assembly on Monday and Tuesday. (Once is not enough) There are several illegal immigration related bills that are stuck in committee and if they are not out within a week or so, they will die! If we don't capitalize on these bills now, they won't be coming back and our chance to get real illegal immigration enforcement in NC will be lost. There is no second chance here folks.
PLEASE, contact the primary sponsors of these bills first. Ask them:
1) What are the chances of House/Senate Bill... getting out of committee?
2) What can you do to assist them in their effort to get their bill out of committee?
Then contact the Chairmen of these committees and explain (be civil):
1) NC is spending over $1.3 billion dollars per year just to educate, incarcerate and give emergency treatment to illegal aliens
2) The majority of NC citizens support immigration enforcement
3) When is House/Senate Bill ... coming out of committee?
On the HOUSE side:
HB343- Support Law Enforcement/SAFE Neighborhoods
It is currently in the Committee on Judiciary Subcommittee A
Chairman: John M. Blust
Phone: 919-733-5781
Email: John.Blust@ncleg.net
Primary Sponsors:
George Cleveland
Phone: 919-715-6707
Email: George.Cleveland@ncleg.net
John M. Blust
Phone: 919-733-5781
Email: John.Blust@ncleg.net
Mark K. Hilton
Phone: 919-733-5988
Email: Mark.Hilton@ncleg.net
HB351- "Voter ID"
It is currently in the House Committee On Appropriations
Chairman: Harold J. Brubaker
Phone: 919-715-4946
Email: Harold.Brubaker@ncleg.net
Primary Sponsors:
David R. Lewis
Phone: 919-715-3015
Email: David.Lewis@ncleg.net
Tim Moore
Phone: 919-733-4838
Email: Tim.Moore@ncleg.net
Ric Killian
Phone: 919-733-5886
Email: Ric.Killian@ncleg.net
On the SENATE side:
HB33- State Law to Provide for Acceptable ID's
It is currently in the Committee On Rules and Operations of the Senate
Chairman: Tom Apodaca
Phone: (919) 733-5745
Email: Tom.Apodaca@ncleg.net
S204- Public Entities & Contractors/Use E-Verify
It is currently in the Committee On Rules and Operations of the Senate
Chairman: Tom Apodaca
Phone: (919) 733-5745
Email: Tom.Apodaca@ncleg.net
Primary Sponsor: Austin M. Allran
Phone: (919) 733-5876
Email: Austin.Allran@ncleg.net
S205- No Benefits For Illegal Aliens
It is currently in the Committee On Rules and Operations of the Senate
Chairman: Tom Apodaca
Phone: (919) 733-5745
Email: Tom.Apodaca@ncleg.net
Primary Sponsor: Austin M. Allran
Phone: (919) 733-5876
Email: Austin.Allran@ncleg.net
S352/S595- "Voter ID"
They are currently in the Committee On Judiciary I
Chairman: Peter S. Brunstetter
Phone: (919) 733-7850
Email: Peter.Brunstetter@ncleg.net
Primary Sponsors: Senator Wesley Meredith (S352)
Phone: (919) 733-5776
Email: Wesley.Meredith@ncleg.net
Ralph Hise (S352)
Phone: (919) 733-3460
Email: Ralph.Hise@ncleg.net
Debbie A. Clary (S595)
Phone: (919) 715-3038
Email: Debbie.Clary@ncleg.net
THANK YOU!
James Johnson
President-NCFIRE
North Carolinians For Immigration Reform and Enforcement
http://www.ncfire.info/
www.Facebook.com/NCFIRE
NCFIRE@ncfire.info
NCFIRE Hotline: 1-888-885-0879
cell # 910-286-3022
PLEASE, contact the primary sponsors of these bills first. Ask them:
1) What are the chances of House/Senate Bill... getting out of committee?
2) What can you do to assist them in their effort to get their bill out of committee?
Then contact the Chairmen of these committees and explain (be civil):
1) NC is spending over $1.3 billion dollars per year just to educate, incarcerate and give emergency treatment to illegal aliens
2) The majority of NC citizens support immigration enforcement
3) When is House/Senate Bill ... coming out of committee?
On the HOUSE side:
HB343- Support Law Enforcement/SAFE Neighborhoods
It is currently in the Committee on Judiciary Subcommittee A
Chairman: John M. Blust
Phone: 919-733-5781
Email: John.Blust@ncleg.net
Primary Sponsors:
George Cleveland
Phone: 919-715-6707
Email: George.Cleveland@ncleg.net
John M. Blust
Phone: 919-733-5781
Email: John.Blust@ncleg.net
Mark K. Hilton
Phone: 919-733-5988
Email: Mark.Hilton@ncleg.net
HB351- "Voter ID"
It is currently in the House Committee On Appropriations
Chairman: Harold J. Brubaker
Phone: 919-715-4946
Email: Harold.Brubaker@ncleg.net
Primary Sponsors:
David R. Lewis
Phone: 919-715-3015
Email: David.Lewis@ncleg.net
Tim Moore
Phone: 919-733-4838
Email: Tim.Moore@ncleg.net
Ric Killian
Phone: 919-733-5886
Email: Ric.Killian@ncleg.net
On the SENATE side:
HB33- State Law to Provide for Acceptable ID's
It is currently in the Committee On Rules and Operations of the Senate
Chairman: Tom Apodaca
Phone: (919) 733-5745
Email: Tom.Apodaca@ncleg.net
S204- Public Entities & Contractors/Use E-Verify
It is currently in the Committee On Rules and Operations of the Senate
Chairman: Tom Apodaca
Phone: (919) 733-5745
Email: Tom.Apodaca@ncleg.net
Primary Sponsor: Austin M. Allran
Phone: (919) 733-5876
Email: Austin.Allran@ncleg.net
S205- No Benefits For Illegal Aliens
It is currently in the Committee On Rules and Operations of the Senate
Chairman: Tom Apodaca
Phone: (919) 733-5745
Email: Tom.Apodaca@ncleg.net
Primary Sponsor: Austin M. Allran
Phone: (919) 733-5876
Email: Austin.Allran@ncleg.net
S352/S595- "Voter ID"
They are currently in the Committee On Judiciary I
Chairman: Peter S. Brunstetter
Phone: (919) 733-7850
Email: Peter.Brunstetter@ncleg.net
Primary Sponsors: Senator Wesley Meredith (S352)
Phone: (919) 733-5776
Email: Wesley.Meredith@ncleg.net
Ralph Hise (S352)
Phone: (919) 733-3460
Email: Ralph.Hise@ncleg.net
Debbie A. Clary (S595)
Phone: (919) 715-3038
Email: Debbie.Clary@ncleg.net
THANK YOU!
James Johnson
President-NCFIRE
North Carolinians For Immigration Reform and Enforcement
http://www.ncfire.info/
www.Facebook.com/NCFIRE
NCFIRE@ncfire.info
NCFIRE Hotline: 1-888-885-0879
cell # 910-286-3022
OPINION: Townhall.com--Dr. Mike Adams
Personal Liberty 101
http://townhall.com/columnists/mikeadams/2011/05/09/personal_liberty_101/page/full/
“Destruction of the embryo in the mother’s womb is a violation of the right to live which God has bestowed upon this nascent life. To raise the question of whether we are here concerned already with a human being or not is merely to confuse the issue. The simple fact is that God certainly intended to create a human being and that this nascent human being has been deliberately deprived of its life. And that is nothing but murder.” – Dietrich Bonheoffer.
Over the course of the last two weeks I have had conversations with two men who claim to be conservative but who also steadfastly defend a woman’s right to choose abortion. In both cases, the self-proclaimed conservative asserted that the government has no right to tell a woman what to do with “her” body. One went so far as to say that a government that could outlaw abortion could also re-institute slavery.
Support for a so-called constitutional right to abortion is completely at odds with conservatism. In fact, when you hear a “conservative” claiming to support abortion rights you can be certain that the individual simply does not understand basic conservative principles. In all likelihood the pro-abortion-choice “conservative” adopts the label because of self-interest. Perhaps he makes good money and does not want to pay high taxes. What makes a person human does not necessarily make him conservative.
When you suspect you are talking to a pseudo-conservative there are usually two questions you can ask that will either confirm or disconfirm your suspicions immediately.
First and foremost, it is important to ask the self-proclaimed conservative the following: “Do you believe in the inherent ‘goodness’ or ‘perfectibility’ of mankind.” If you hear a “yes” you are talking to a liberal. If you hear “Did you mean to say ‘person-kind’?” you are talking to a feminist. (So end the conversation as quickly as possible!).
If you hear the right answer to question one, you can move on to question two: “Does man get his rights from other men?” If you hear a “yes” you are talking to a liberal. If you hear “Did you mean to say ‘persons’” you are still talking to a feminist. (I thought I told you to end the conversation as quickly as possible!).
Roe v. Wade was (and is) a deeply flawed ruling because it is predicated upon the notion that man can grant rights to man not granted to him by God. The distinction between the first, second, and third trimesters was not based upon any long-standing legal doctrine. Nor was it based upon solid and reliable medical evidence. It was simply based upon identity politics.
Harry Blackmun, author of the majority opinion in Roe, once said “I no longer shall tinker with the machinery of death.” That was from his opinion in a death penalty case. But Blackmun also said that our “Constitution compels abortion on demand.” That basic human rights should be assigned in such an arbitrary manner does lend credence to Blackmun’s characterizations – made in a different context - of the Justices as “eccentrics” and “prima donnas.”
The authors of our Declaration of Independence - as well as the Framers of our Constitution – had a very different view of the origin and assignment of basic human rights. Lest we forget: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights - that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness - To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed …”
Medical technology has come a long way since 1973. It has told us what we knew in our hearts all along; namely, that abortion, regardless of the trimester in which it is performed, constitutes a deprivation of life initiated by our Creator.
Ultrasound technology allows us a better view of the target of the procedure known as abortion. It takes little intelligence to understand that something that is moving (and growing) is indeed alive. Technology also shows us that a new heart is beating within a month of conception. Surgical abortions are not even performed until 6 to 7 weeks into the pregnancy.
This issue is important as the conservative movement seeks in future elections to make inroads among blacks, Hispanics, and younger voters. It is important because all three of these groups have something in common: They are clearly pro-life on the issue of abortion.
Younger voters are moving in the direction of life simply because they are the first generation to grow up with basic access to and familiarity with ultrasound technology. With the help of this younger generation, which now responds to opinion polls, the country passed the 50% mark in opposition to abortion just two years ago.
So it would be politically disastrous for the conservative movement to compromise on abortion. We are in the enviable position of being out in front on an issue that is consistent with both our political goals and our deeply held principles. Leave it to the opposition to argue that men have endowed us with an unalienable right to stop a beating heart.
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts "Womyn" On Campus.
http://townhall.com/columnists/mikeadams/2011/05/09/personal_liberty_101/page/full/
“Destruction of the embryo in the mother’s womb is a violation of the right to live which God has bestowed upon this nascent life. To raise the question of whether we are here concerned already with a human being or not is merely to confuse the issue. The simple fact is that God certainly intended to create a human being and that this nascent human being has been deliberately deprived of its life. And that is nothing but murder.” – Dietrich Bonheoffer.
Over the course of the last two weeks I have had conversations with two men who claim to be conservative but who also steadfastly defend a woman’s right to choose abortion. In both cases, the self-proclaimed conservative asserted that the government has no right to tell a woman what to do with “her” body. One went so far as to say that a government that could outlaw abortion could also re-institute slavery.
Support for a so-called constitutional right to abortion is completely at odds with conservatism. In fact, when you hear a “conservative” claiming to support abortion rights you can be certain that the individual simply does not understand basic conservative principles. In all likelihood the pro-abortion-choice “conservative” adopts the label because of self-interest. Perhaps he makes good money and does not want to pay high taxes. What makes a person human does not necessarily make him conservative.
When you suspect you are talking to a pseudo-conservative there are usually two questions you can ask that will either confirm or disconfirm your suspicions immediately.
First and foremost, it is important to ask the self-proclaimed conservative the following: “Do you believe in the inherent ‘goodness’ or ‘perfectibility’ of mankind.” If you hear a “yes” you are talking to a liberal. If you hear “Did you mean to say ‘person-kind’?” you are talking to a feminist. (So end the conversation as quickly as possible!).
If you hear the right answer to question one, you can move on to question two: “Does man get his rights from other men?” If you hear a “yes” you are talking to a liberal. If you hear “Did you mean to say ‘persons’” you are still talking to a feminist. (I thought I told you to end the conversation as quickly as possible!).
Roe v. Wade was (and is) a deeply flawed ruling because it is predicated upon the notion that man can grant rights to man not granted to him by God. The distinction between the first, second, and third trimesters was not based upon any long-standing legal doctrine. Nor was it based upon solid and reliable medical evidence. It was simply based upon identity politics.
Harry Blackmun, author of the majority opinion in Roe, once said “I no longer shall tinker with the machinery of death.” That was from his opinion in a death penalty case. But Blackmun also said that our “Constitution compels abortion on demand.” That basic human rights should be assigned in such an arbitrary manner does lend credence to Blackmun’s characterizations – made in a different context - of the Justices as “eccentrics” and “prima donnas.”
The authors of our Declaration of Independence - as well as the Framers of our Constitution – had a very different view of the origin and assignment of basic human rights. Lest we forget: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights - that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness - To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed …”
Medical technology has come a long way since 1973. It has told us what we knew in our hearts all along; namely, that abortion, regardless of the trimester in which it is performed, constitutes a deprivation of life initiated by our Creator.
Ultrasound technology allows us a better view of the target of the procedure known as abortion. It takes little intelligence to understand that something that is moving (and growing) is indeed alive. Technology also shows us that a new heart is beating within a month of conception. Surgical abortions are not even performed until 6 to 7 weeks into the pregnancy.
This issue is important as the conservative movement seeks in future elections to make inroads among blacks, Hispanics, and younger voters. It is important because all three of these groups have something in common: They are clearly pro-life on the issue of abortion.
Younger voters are moving in the direction of life simply because they are the first generation to grow up with basic access to and familiarity with ultrasound technology. With the help of this younger generation, which now responds to opinion polls, the country passed the 50% mark in opposition to abortion just two years ago.
So it would be politically disastrous for the conservative movement to compromise on abortion. We are in the enviable position of being out in front on an issue that is consistent with both our political goals and our deeply held principles. Leave it to the opposition to argue that men have endowed us with an unalienable right to stop a beating heart.
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts "Womyn" On Campus.
Sunday, May 8, 2011
Sun Journal Letter to the Editor: CCTA Member Louis Call
ACORNS grow
May 8, 2011
Folks may have thought that ACORN was out of business after federal funding was cut but not so, as the Judicial Watch group recently reported. According to Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, “today ACORN is alive and well, splintered into rebranded local chapters across the country.” As an example, ACORN affiliates in various states are changing their names in a desperate bid to restore federal grants and other revenue sources.
As an example, in New York, ACORN is New York Communities for Change. In Arkansas, ACORN has become Arkansas Community Organizations; in Missouri, ACORN is Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment (MORE). In Rhode Island and Connecticut the organization is now New England United for Justice.
The role of ACORN in North Carolina is a little more clouded but during my research I found that before the last general election, the organization registered more than 27,000 new voters in North Carolina, most of them in Durham and Charlotte.
Local election officials found that during their investigation of ACORN’s registration practices some forms it filed had information that may have been copied from phone books. Durham County’s elections office turned over about 120 suspect forms to the state for investigation and Wake County’s elections office sent in about 30 suspicious forms.
Admittedly this is a small number but it represents what they found and it doesn’t answer the question, how many did they review out of 27,000. With the 2012 election ahead of us it would be naïve to think that voter fraud will not play a role in Obama’s favor. When you consider that his attorney general, Eric Holder, refused to prosecute three members of the New Black Panther Party on charges of voter intimidation in Philadelphia during the last general election, voter fraud is not much of a stretch.
Undoubtedly Obama will ride a new wave of popularity with the killing of bin Laden but the prospect of voter fraud should be kept on the front burner. There is too much at stake in 2012 and our nation can’t afford another four years of this Socialist. The future freedom of our children and grandchildren depends on his defeat, and that starts now.
Louis Call
River Bend, NC
© Copyright 2011 Freedom Communications. All Rights Reserved.
May 8, 2011
Folks may have thought that ACORN was out of business after federal funding was cut but not so, as the Judicial Watch group recently reported. According to Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, “today ACORN is alive and well, splintered into rebranded local chapters across the country.” As an example, ACORN affiliates in various states are changing their names in a desperate bid to restore federal grants and other revenue sources.
As an example, in New York, ACORN is New York Communities for Change. In Arkansas, ACORN has become Arkansas Community Organizations; in Missouri, ACORN is Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment (MORE). In Rhode Island and Connecticut the organization is now New England United for Justice.
The role of ACORN in North Carolina is a little more clouded but during my research I found that before the last general election, the organization registered more than 27,000 new voters in North Carolina, most of them in Durham and Charlotte.
Local election officials found that during their investigation of ACORN’s registration practices some forms it filed had information that may have been copied from phone books. Durham County’s elections office turned over about 120 suspect forms to the state for investigation and Wake County’s elections office sent in about 30 suspicious forms.
Admittedly this is a small number but it represents what they found and it doesn’t answer the question, how many did they review out of 27,000. With the 2012 election ahead of us it would be naïve to think that voter fraud will not play a role in Obama’s favor. When you consider that his attorney general, Eric Holder, refused to prosecute three members of the New Black Panther Party on charges of voter intimidation in Philadelphia during the last general election, voter fraud is not much of a stretch.
Undoubtedly Obama will ride a new wave of popularity with the killing of bin Laden but the prospect of voter fraud should be kept on the front burner. There is too much at stake in 2012 and our nation can’t afford another four years of this Socialist. The future freedom of our children and grandchildren depends on his defeat, and that starts now.
Louis Call
River Bend, NC
© Copyright 2011 Freedom Communications. All Rights Reserved.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
