SUN JOURNAL LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Liberal double standards by CCTA VICE CHAIRMAN, NANCY MURDOCH

2011-10-21

When members of the Tea Party voiced their concerns about the direction President Obama is taking the United States, we were called racist among other vile things. Now we have a black man, descendent of slaves, running for president as a GOP conservative and he is being attacked as not being a true black man, a traitor to his race, an Uncle Tom, and worse. Instead of being a race baiter the likes of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, he has become a model of what hard work and education can achieve, regardless of your background or circumstances.

Paul Field, in a recent letter, criticized Mr. Cain because of his lack of political experience. Exactly what kind of experience did the current occupant of the White House have? A community organizer with close ties to unions and people of questionable character (the Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers) does not make for a great resume. Presumably he’s very smart, but no one seems to have any proof other than his adeptness with a teleprompter. Mr. Obama has never run as much as a lemonade stand, but the American people saw fit to elect him to head the largest economy in the world.

I would be careful stating every GOP front-runner has been betrayed by his/her own words. Obama made promises when he was running for election too, and most have fallen by the wayside: getting out of the wars (he’s added another), closing Gitmo (no), transparency (joke), no lobbyists (he hired many) and others too long to list. I will say he’s still working on that redistributing the wealth thing by fanning the fires of class envy.
lthe Civil Rights Act was a noble thing, and the Democrats love to take credit for it. However, limited knowledge of history does not change it. Eisenhower was instrumental in enforcing integration, and even though Johnson was president when the Civil Rights Act was passed, 80 percent of the GOP voted for it and only 63% of the Democrats. The 13th Amendment (ending slavery) had 100 percent support of the GOP; only 23% of Democrats. And the 15th Amendment (the right to vote) garnered 100 percent of the GOP vote with a big goose egg for the Democrats.

It makes perfect sense that Herman Cain is a Republican. As he said, perhaps some blacks have been “brainwashed”.

Nancy Murdoch, Havelock
CCTA VICE CHAIRMAN

Human Events

The Democrat Plantation


by Richard Bernstein
09/13/2010

When black Americans' ancestors were enslaved in pre-Civil War America, they were compelled to live lives shaped by their masters. Uniformity was required, and disobedience was punished. As a result of this ongoing powerlessness, slaves developed what has been described as a "plantation mentality."


So what's changed? For an overwhelming majority of black Americans, nothing much. They still embrace a plantation mentality, but they've changed "masters:" from slave-owners to the Democratic Party.

Perhaps blind loyalty to a political party they perceive as their "protectors" is an inevitable consequence of black Americans' unique history. That such loyalty is to a Democrat party whoseown history is a tattered tale of segregation and racism is mind-boggling.

How many black Americans know Martin Luther King's battle to desegregate the South had him fighting Democrats, such as Georgia Gov. Lester Maddox, who refused to serve blacks in his restaurant in defiance of the 1964 Civil rights Act; Alabama Gov. George Wallace, who ended his 1962 gubernatorial victory speech with the phrase, "segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever;" or Alabama Public Safety Commissioner Eugene "Bull" Connor, who prevented integration using attack dogs and fire hoses against protesters?

How many black Americans know the Republican Party was formed in 1854 as the anti-slavery party—even as Democrats founded the Ku Klux Klan in 1866? How many know President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, (who voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1957) along with his brother Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy, had Martin Luther King wire-tapped by the FBI in the hope they could prove he was a Communist?

How many Americans of any ethnic persuasion know Martin Luther King was a Republican? How many know it was Republicans who established the NAACP?

Most historians consider the Civil Rights Act of 1964 a defining moment in black America's fight for equality. Because it was passed during the administration of Democratic President Lyndon Johnson, Democrats became known as party of de-segregation—even though a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats voted in favor of the bill. And despite the reality that 23 Democratic senators filibustered the bill, trying to prevent its passage.

The same historians note that Republican Barry Goldwater's opposition to the bill was the turning point for many black Americans. In reality, Goldwater's opposition to the bill had nothing to doing with race—and everything to do with what he considered an "unlawful expansion" of federal power.

As far as the unlawful expansion of federal power goes, Goldwater has been thoroughly vindicated.

If black Americans wish to be Democrats, that is their choice—or is it? Despite the fact that Democrats enjoy the support of over 90% of black America, the other 10%, those who dare to "stray from the plantation," have been routinely vilified—by other black Americans. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has been depicted as a lawn jockey, and former Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, as a monkey and a parrot. Both, along with countless other non-Democrat blacks, have been referred to as "house niggers" or "Uncle Toms" for embracing conservative values.

The not-so-subtle message? Support liberal dogma—or face social ostracism.

Why the need to vilify the non-conformists? Ironically, the political party which portrays itself as the "champion of tolerance and freedom" knows that free-thinking black Americans represent a mortal threat to its power base. Democrats know that a failure to maintain the modern-day version of the plantation mentality—eternal victimhood caused by a hopelessly racist society which can only be alleviated by government hand-outs—would force them to compete for a bloc of voters they currently take for granted.

It would also cost Democrats a ton of money. Few things are more profitable than keeping the "racial grievance" industry alive. Thousands of Americans employed in jobs such as "promoting diversity," teaching "race sensitivity" classes, or maintaining quotas in employment, government-sponsored minority set-asides, and university admissions—every one of which is an extension of the liberal worldview—would be forced to look elsewhere for work.

In short, people judged by the content of their character instead of the color of their skin is a bridge too far for a Democrat party which does quite well promoting exactly the opposite. Far better for Democrats to tell black Americans that racism is "as bad as it's ever been"—even as they side-step their own party's historical involvement in it.

Yet at some point, black Americans might want to ask themselves:

If you've hitched yourselves to the Democrat party for 50-plus years, and racism is as bad as it's ever been, at what point do you hold Democrats accountable?

At what point do you leave the Democrat plantation behind?

Richard Bernstein is the author of "Duped America: How Democrats and the Mainstream Media Have Duped the American People and Are Harming Our Country" (Forrester Publishing Company, 2010).