Now Egypt looks to ‘expose’ Obama

Now Egypt looks to ‘expose’ Obama

Barack’s Egyptian Hoax: American Influence Must Never Help Impose Tyranny!

15 Reasons Why America Must Embrace Bible-Friendly Policy to Survive the 3rd Millennium (pt. 2)

During the current Egyptian unrest, where popular opinion helped depose democratically elected Islamist President Mohamed Morsi, we do well to reflect on America’s values and mission in the world.  Should America span the globe to spread unrest in unpopular regimes, then empower whatever type of government seems to sprout up, afterward? Or should America reserve its power and influence to help establish American Revolution-styled states?

In fact, one desperately hopes it is screamingly obvious that if the US helps create any government opposed to our values, that we are helping establish our future enemies.  When the Muslim Spring movement arrived amongst much fanfare, the liberal elites heralded this as Obama’s foreign policy coming of age. Muslim Spring is the Barack inspired doctrine offer to aid resisters against Middle East dictators, helping any rebels despite whatever beliefs they espoused. How wise it was, they exclaimed, to direct wars from far-away, to keep American troops out of harm’s Nway, and lead from behind!  

Other more realistic analysts declared the notion of tossing aside foreign leaders, some strongly pro-American, a recipe for disaster. (see Obama Support of “Arab Spring”‚ÄîClear Marxist Values Leading to Sharia Law Revolution) Further, the idea that America would look the other way while Muslim Shariah Law directed governments were established across the zone, with US aid, seemed surreal. 

In short order, the governments of Egypt, Libya, Yemen and now Syria were part of a movement replacing secular tyrannies with what pompous leftists claimed would be an American Revolution type undertaking. Instead, as seen in Egypt, a functional, and US friendly secular tyranny was replaced by a radical Muslim dictatorship imposing Shariah Law, inserted by the Muslim Brotherhood radicals who engineered the coup.

CONTINUED:  http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/56841?utm_source=CFP+Mailout&utm_campaign=bbe386515e-Call_to_Champions&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d8f503f036-bbe386515e-291132961

Canada Free Press: Barack’s Egyptian Hoax: American Influence Must Never Help Impose Tyranny!

15 Reasons Why America Must Embrace Bible-Friendly Policy to Survive the 3rd Millennium (pt. 2)

During the current Egyptian unrest, where popular opinion helped depose democratically elected Islamist President Mohamed Morsi, we do well to reflect on America’s values and mission in the world.

Should America span the globe to spread unrest in unpopular regimes, then empower whatever type of government seems to sprout up, afterward? Or should America reserve its power and influence to help establish American Revolution-styled states? In fact, one desperately hopes it is screamingly obvious that if the US helps create any government opposed to our values, that we are helping establish our future enemies.

When the Muslim Spring movement arrived amongst much fanfare, the liberal elites heralded this as Obama’s foreign policy coming of age. Muslim Spring is the Barack inspired doctrine offer to aid resisters against Middle East dictators, helping any rebels despite whatever beliefs they espoused. How wise it was, they exclaimed, to direct wars from far-away, to keep American troops out of harm’s way, and lead from behind!

Other more realistic analysts declared the notion of tossing aside foreign leaders, some strongly pro-American, a recipe for disaster. (see Obama Support of “Arab Spring”‚ÄîClear Marxist Values Leading to Sharia Law Revolution) Further, the idea that America would look the other way while Muslim Shariah Law directed governments were established across the zone, with US aid, seemed surreal. In short order, the governments of Egypt, Libya, Yemen and now Syria were part of a movement replacing secular tyrannies with what pompous leftists claimed would be an American Revolution type undertaking. Instead, as seen in Egypt, a functional, and US friendly secular tyranny was replaced by a radical Muslim dictatorship imposing Shariah Law, inserted by the Muslim Brotherhood radicals who engineered the coup.

I. Arab Spring Becomes Muslim Brotherhood Nightmare in Egypt

In brief, the problem in Egypt is the problem in the Middle East—Obama decided to back a coup for a group of men who were Muslim radicals and didn’t seem to mind, against one of America’s most reliable allies—Hosni Mubarick. If this isn’t troubling enough, when the Egyptians themselves became alarmed at the new government’s draconian powers, America did nothing. Further, when the military finally stepped in and removed Muhammad Morsi, Barack was steamed. Obama acted as if the entire idea behind removing Mubarak—by far the wold’s wealthiest man at $700 billion, according to Forbes—was to install a Muslim law government.

When Morsi was replaced, Obama acted like a petulant child, ready to ignore the new government and refusing to give his blessing. But what is going on here? Does Barack really replace Middle Eastern strongmen so that religious fanatics can take over and create dozens of Irans across the region? Does Obama not value real democracy over a Shariah pseudo-republic? Is he completely blind to how dangerous a hegemony of Islamic law regimes would be to America’s interest? Or, as usual, is he too cool to care?

Something must be done to reestablish the American policy of creating strong allies, and the creation of functional democracies, wherever possible. And the “Obama Doctrine” of backing any random pack of rebels, regardless of their ideology, must be flushed down the toilet where it belongs.

II. Obama’s Failed Anti-Freedom Foreign Policy

Obama’s entire foreign policy has come apart at the seams. The reason his foreign policy relentlessly fails is it is built on a crust of timidity defended by self-serving platitudes. When Iran protested its rigged election, and asked Obama to intervene, he turned the other cheek. But when Germany and Italy informed Barack they would intervene in Libya, with or without American support, he reluctantly joined. It is simply in Obama’s temperament to join someone else’s undertaking and take credit for its inception, as he did here.

But how could Obama hope to be respected by foreign leaders who only respect power? Barack has a sanctimonious explanation for every action and inaction. He, therefore is not regarded as a serious or effective leader or as someone decisive or dangerous. Instead, he’s a laughingstock to tough leaders like Russia’s Vlad Putin. Barack is a verbose amateur who has no training or instinct for leadership, and it shows.

CONTINUED: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/56841?utm_source=CFP+Mailout&utm_campaign=bbe386515e-Call_to_Champions&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d8f503f036-bbe386515e-291132961

From Diane Rufino

I got a lot of questions about Obama's "apology" and when Romney went public with his statements.


The US Embassy in Cairo released a statement early on apologizing for the short film ("We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others") as the protests were heating up there, but before the militant attacks in Libya. It re-affirmed that statement up until the time the Egytian embassy was taken and the American flag was taken down and burned and the terrorists were getting organized in Libya. Obama didn't issue a statement. The White House, just as the US embassy in Libya was being attacked, put out a statement saying that the embassy statement was not cleared by the White House and did not represent its policy. But it did not say anything else and did not condemn the attacks. Shortly after that, Romney offered his words.

The following day, after he chose to skip a State Department briefing and before sticking around to learn the fate of Chris Stevens and the others, he headed out to campaign in Vegas.

Obama never actually came out himself to apologize, but the words of those under him represent his official position. Plus he never spoke to the contrary. Only Romney stood up for America's freedom.

I've written up a summary which is attached and which I posted on my website --

http://forloveofgodandcountry.wordpress.com/




It's also posted onTea Party Nation -

http://www.teapartynation.com/profiles/blogs/obama-apologizes-romney-criticizes?xg_source=activity

Egyptians call for Sharia Law, Islamic caliphate

Tens, and perhaps hundreds of thousands of Egyptians poured into Cairo's now-famed Tahrir Square on Friday to demand their nation become subject to Sharia Law and form the cornerstone for a new Islamic caliphate.


The unplanned demonstration erupted following Friday prayers at mosques around the Egyptian capital.

The demonstrators, who were led by the increasingly powerful Muslim Brotherhood, demanded that Egypt's interim military regime give way to an intolerant Islamic dictatorship.

Various news media reported the demonstrators shouting and holding up signs reading: "Egypt will return to Sharia Law!", "Liberals and secularists are the enemies of Allah!", and "The solution is Islam!"

CONTINUED: 

http://www.israeltoday.co.il/NachrichtenHeute/tabid/178/nid/22895/mid/436/dnnprintmode/true/language/en-US/Default.aspx?SkinSrc=%5bG%5dSkins%2f_default%2fNo+Skin&ContainerSrc=%5bG%5dContainers%2f_default%2fNo+Container

TEA PARTY NATION

A warning of war Posted by Judson Phillips on February 15, 2011 at 6:40am


With the attempt by Barack Obama to destablize the Egyptian government, many people now believe there is a greater than 50-50 chance of a major war in the next year.

Mubarak, whatever else you want to say about him, was a source of stability in the Middle East. He could have fought Israel again, after Anwar Sadat was assassinated, but instead he decided there would be peace with Israel.

Now, with Mubarak gone, Hezbollah (read Iran) taking over Lebanon and Jordan and other more moderate Middle Eastern states seeing turmoil, radical elements have the possibility of taking over the region and their number one desire is to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.

Many Americans have forgotten the 1973 war and the Oil Embargo that followed. We saw gas prices spike, gas shortages and economic chaos. Joseph Farah, Editor of World Net Daily and who has covered the Middle East since the 70’s says, “certainly since 1973 have things looked so dangerous and volatile there.”

The danger of a war in the Middle East is two fold for America. First is the actual war itself spreading. Israel is a nuclear power and Israel also has a tragic history. There are still some holocaust survivors alive in Israel and the truth of that tragedy has been burned into the Israeli psyche. They say ‘never again’ for a reason. If the armies of Egypt, Lebanon, Syria and possibly Jordan attack, Israel will fight back. If they have no choice, they will go nuclear. If Israel goes nuclear, it is hard to believe Iran will not be hit, as Iran is behind a lot of what is going on. If Iran and other Muslim countries are hit, is it also hard to believe that Muslim Pakistan will not use some of its nuclear weapons on Israel? This has the possibility of spinning out of control quickly.

The second danger is what would happen to America if radical Islamists take over the Middle East. The Suez Canal and the Straits of Hormuz are two of the key choke points for oil transport. If Islamic states cut oil off again, we will see immediate and catastrophic results. According to Dr. Jerome Corsi, a financial planning expert and author of Atomic Iran, if there is a cut off, oil would quickly shoot to $8 or $9 a gallon.

If gas shot to $8 or $9 a gallon, the American economy would be crippled. The ripple effect would send food prices through the roof. Joseph Farah says, “most Americans have no idea how quickly food shortages could develop in America – the world's breadbasket. We do not have large surpluses of food stored here. If oil prices spike or power outages occur, you would see panic about the basic necessities of life almost immediately. Store shelves would be empty. We haven't seen that in our lifetimes, but with an energy crises and lack of preparedness, we could find ourselves in a real mess.”

With the American economy simply limping along with 10% unemployment and with the real unemployment figure closer to 20%, a doubling or tripling of gas prices and the ripple effect through the rest of the economy would cripple America and probably end America’s status as the preeminent economic super power.

Barack Obama has consciously pushed an agenda in regard to Egypt that makes it much more likely that an Islamist government will eventually take over.

Unfortunately, with Presidential elections still more than eighteen months away, there is little we can do to stop an un-American President who is determined to work against America’s interests and do as much damage to America as he can. Even if this means a war in the Middle East.

This is part one of our series, Warning of War. Next: There is time to prepare. What to do.

Editorial: Howard Galganov

Obama Just Can’t Help Himself



It is one thing for Obama to campaign on empty promises of “YES WE CAN” and “CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN” to a society built upon a framework comfortable with Democracy, where platitudes are mothers’ milk to politicians.


But, it is an entirely different story for an American President to journey to a foreign country, in this case Egypt, to stir the pot with empty words that motivate people with no history or real concept of Secular Democracy.

READ MORE:  http://www.galganov.com/editorials.asp?id=1297

NEWSMAX

Ethanol Production Fueling ‘Food Inflation’


While rising food prices have been a factor in recent riots in Egypt, Tunisia and elsewhere, the United States is continuing to increase its use of corn to make ethanol, pushing up grain and meat prices worldwide.

“The global economy is getting back on its feet, but so too is an old enemy: food inflation,” The Wall Street Journal states in an editorial, noting that the United Nations benchmark index for food reached a record high in December, “raising fears of shortages and higher prices.”

In 2001, only 7 percent of America’s corn crop, about 707 million bushels, was used to make ethanol fuel for vehicles. By 2010, nearly 40 percent of American corn went for ethanol — almost 5 billion bushels out of total U.S. production of 12.4 billion bushels.

American farmers account for about 39 percent of global corn production, and about 16 percent of the crop is exported, so America’s ethanol production can influence world prices.

March futures for corn recently hit a 30-month high of $6.67 a bushel, up from $4 a bushel a year ago.

Also, since 40 percent of U.S. corn production is used as animal feed, rising corn prices push up the cost of beef, poultry and other items as well.

“This trend is the deliberate result of policies designed to subsidize ethanol,” and it “coincides with a growing consensus that ethanol achieves none of its alleged policy goals,” The Journal observes.

Ethanol supporters claim it reduces American dependence on foreign oil, but a Cornell University scientist calculated that even if the entire American crop was used for ethanol, it would satisfy just 4 percent of our oil consumption.

And the Environmental Protection Agency has downplayed assertions that ethanol provides a cleaner source of energy than gasoline, saying it “has a minimal to negative impact on the environment,” according to The Journal.

The American Thinker on Monday observed: “Today there is a global food shortage and sky-rocketing prices. This has become the underlying factor in the riots in Tunisia, Algeria and Egypt, where up to 56 percent of a person's income is dedicated to the acquisition of food. These riots are now leading to the upheaval of governments and the very real possibility of the ascendancy of the radical elements into control.”

A significant factor “in the overall global food situation is the American decision to, in essence, burn food in its cars, a policy championed by the environmentalists since the 1990s,” American Thinker also noted.

“There is no quicker way to foment riots and revolution than to deprive the populace of food, particularly when so much daily income goes into feeding oneself and one's family. The pictures we have seen in North Africa may well be repeated elsewhere throughout the world.”

Noting that Congress recently voted to extend the $5 billion tax credit for blending ethanol into gasoline, The Journal concludes: “At a time when the world will need more corn and grains, it makes no sense to devote scarce farmland to make a fuel that exists only because of taxpayer subsidies and mandates.

“If food supplies tighten and prices keep rising, such a policy will soon become immoral.”

http://news.newsmax.com/?Z6O6YsduR8ijg3PlHXRUmnumz3ykbLR1Z

WORLD NET DAILY

Pro-Brotherhood CAIR lobbied against Mubarak--Egyptian envoy rebuked Washington-based group over 'interference'

A U.S. front organization for the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood has lobbied the State Department in recent years to pressure Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to open national elections to the banned Muslim Brotherhood, a book reveals.


Read more:    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=259409#ixzz1D5rhi0xx

Beck says Egyptian unrest could lead to new caliphate | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment

Fox News host Glenn Beck described an alarming scenario Tuesday night stemming from the unrest in Egypt. He said that the protests in Egypt could cause a domino effect, leading to the creation of an Islamic caliphate.

“You’re watching a well-orchestrated campaign” said Beck, “the people who want ‘change,’ they don’t think it’s crazy.”

READ MORE AND SEE THE VIDEO:
http://dailycaller.com/2011/02/01/beck-says-egyptian-unrest-could-lead-to-new-caliphate/

Randy's Right

Obama Regime Met With Muslim Brotherhood to Discuss Future of Egypt After “Fall” of Mubarak


JERUSALEM — The Egyptian government has information a diplomat at the U.S. embassy in Cairo secretly met yesterday with a senior leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, the nation’s major Islamist opposition group, WND has learned.


READ MORE:  http://randysright.wordpress.com/2011/02/02/obama-regime-met-with-muslim-brotherhood-to-discuss-future-of-egypt-after-%e2%80%9cfall%e2%80%9d-of-mubarak/

OBAMA OKs MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD!!!

Obama green-lighting Muslim Brotherhood participation in Egyptian government

Welcome to the new reality of cold, hard choices in Egypt, and the consequences of democracy in regions where radicalism thrives.  In order to stay ahead of the crisis in Egypt, the Obama administration yesterday signaled that it supports the participation of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egyptian politics as long as they renounce violence and commit to democracy:

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/02/01/obama-green-lighting-muslim-brotherhood-participation-in-egyptian-government/

Editorial: Howard Galganov

Editorial: Egypt – Obama’s Words Have Consequences. - Galganov.com

Joys of Muslim Women

This was written by a woman born in Egypt as a Muslim.

This is not hearsay, and it will scare the life out of you.
Make sure you read the paragraph (in red) towards the end.

Joys of Muslim Women
by Nonie Darwish



In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year old and have sexual intimacy with this child. Consummating the marriage by 9.

The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman (who becomes his slave) and for the purchase of the private parts of the woman, to use her as a toy.

Even though a woman is abused she can not obtain a divorce.

To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses.

Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return the dowry. The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family. Husbands can beat their wives 'at will' and he does not have to say why he has beaten her.

The husband is permitted to have (4 wives) and a temporary wife for an hour (prostitute) at his discretion.

The Shariah Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of the woman.

In the West World ( America ) Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah Law so the wife can not obtain a divorce and he can have full and complete control of her. It is amazing and alarming how many of our sisters and daughters attending American Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly to the Shariah law.

By passing this on, enlightened American women may avoid becoming a slave under Shariah Law.

Ripping the West in Two.

Author and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the goal of radical Islamists is to impose Shariah law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two.

She recently authored the book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law.

Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza before immigrating to America in 1978, when she was eight years old. Her father died while leading covert attacks on Israel . He was a high-ranking Egyptian military officer stationed with his family in Gaza .

When he died, he was considered a "shahid," a martyr for jihad. His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family an elevated position in Muslim society.

But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her own Muslim culture and upbringing.. She converted to Christianity after hearing a Christian preacher on television.

In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping sharia law - what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries.

For the West, she says radical Islamists are working to impose sharia on the world. If that happens, Western civilization will be destroyed. Westerners generally assume all religions encourage a respect for the dignity of each individual. Islamic law (Sharia) teaches that non-Muslims should be subjugated or killed in this world.

Peace and prosperity for one's children is not as important as assuring that Islamic law rules everywhere in the Middle East and eventually in the world.

While Westerners tend to think that all religions encourage some form of the golden rule, Sharia teaches two systems of ethics - one for Muslims and another for non-Muslims. Building on tribal practices of the seventh century, Sharia encourages the side of humanity that wants to take from and subjugate others..

While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing a personal understanding of and relationship with God, Sharia advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as criticism.

It's hard to imagine, that in this day and age, Islamic scholars agree that those who criticize Islam or choose to stop being Muslim should be executed. Sadly, while talk of an Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by many in the West, such murmurings in the Middle East are silenced through intimidation.

While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance over time, Darwish explains how petro dollars are being used to grow an extremely intolerant form of political Islam in her native Egypt and elsewhere.

(In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.S. to elect the President by themselves! Rest assured they will do so... You can look at how they have taken over several towns in the USA .. Dearborn Mich. is one... and there are others...)

I think everyone in the U.S. should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!

It is too bad that so many are disillusioned with life and Christianity to accept Muslims as peaceful.. some may be but they have an army that is willing to shed blood in the name of Islam.. the peaceful support the warriors with their finances and own kind of patriotism to their religion. While America is getting rid of Christianity from all public sites and erasing God from the lives of children the Muslims are planning a great jihad on America ..