By Alexander Bolton
Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) has resigned from the Senate to take over the conservative Heritage Foundation.
"It's been an honor to serve the people of South Carolina in the United States Senate for the past eight years, but now it's time for me to pass the torch to someone else and take on a new role in the fight for America's future," DeMint said in a statement that took Washington by surprise.
READ MORE: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/271411-jim-demint-resigns-from-senate
Showing posts with label Sen Jim DeMint. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sen Jim DeMint. Show all posts
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Dick Morris: A MODERN CONSERVATIVE MANIFESTO
Published on DickMorris.com on January 16, 2012
A Book Review of Now or Never: Saving America from Economic Collapse by Senator Jim Demint
Jim DeMint is a new kind of U.S. Senator. He puts allegiance to conservative principles ahead of partisanship and sees his role as promoting, not just a Republican majority, but a conservative majority within the GOP caucus. With Senators like Florida's Marco Rubio, Kentucky's Rand Paul, Oklahoma's Tom Coburn, Utah's Mike Lee, and Pennsylvania's Pat Toomey, he defines what it means to be a conservative in the Obama era.
His new book, Now or Never: Saving America from Economic Collapse, is a manifesto for his movement, a credo for his convictions. He explains that while we all must unite in opposing Obama's nation-destroying policies, we must also keep our eye focused on conservative answers to today's problems. He goes deeper than mere partisanship and nay-saying and, with the assistance of his fellow Senators who contributed to the book, he articulates a real program for American revival.
And DeMint is not just some senator who wrote a book. His efforts have fueled the conservative movement's takeover of the Republican Party. He gets involved in primary contests and backs the real conservatives in the race without fear of offending the RINO (Republican In Name Only) senators with whom he must serve and work.
But DeMint's movement is not about personalities. It is about ideas. And the senator has recognized the implicit obligation that comes with staking out a conservative movement within the GOP: To define the principles of that effort lest it degenerate into a factional turf war.
How can we avoid succumbing to a global debt repudiation cycle that is creating a decade of economic stagnation? How can American companies thrive on foreign competition and not be dragged under? Can America achieve energy independence in the very near future? These questions form the core of his work.
Now or Never: Saving America from Economic Collapse is a very important book that must be read now because the alternative is that we never see these ideas realized. As we all focus on beating Obama, Jim DeMint has articulated a substantive agenda to replace him. And it is just in time.
http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/a-modern-conservative-manifesto/
A Book Review of Now or Never: Saving America from Economic Collapse by Senator Jim Demint
Jim DeMint is a new kind of U.S. Senator. He puts allegiance to conservative principles ahead of partisanship and sees his role as promoting, not just a Republican majority, but a conservative majority within the GOP caucus. With Senators like Florida's Marco Rubio, Kentucky's Rand Paul, Oklahoma's Tom Coburn, Utah's Mike Lee, and Pennsylvania's Pat Toomey, he defines what it means to be a conservative in the Obama era.
His new book, Now or Never: Saving America from Economic Collapse, is a manifesto for his movement, a credo for his convictions. He explains that while we all must unite in opposing Obama's nation-destroying policies, we must also keep our eye focused on conservative answers to today's problems. He goes deeper than mere partisanship and nay-saying and, with the assistance of his fellow Senators who contributed to the book, he articulates a real program for American revival.
And DeMint is not just some senator who wrote a book. His efforts have fueled the conservative movement's takeover of the Republican Party. He gets involved in primary contests and backs the real conservatives in the race without fear of offending the RINO (Republican In Name Only) senators with whom he must serve and work.
But DeMint's movement is not about personalities. It is about ideas. And the senator has recognized the implicit obligation that comes with staking out a conservative movement within the GOP: To define the principles of that effort lest it degenerate into a factional turf war.
How can we avoid succumbing to a global debt repudiation cycle that is creating a decade of economic stagnation? How can American companies thrive on foreign competition and not be dragged under? Can America achieve energy independence in the very near future? These questions form the core of his work.
Now or Never: Saving America from Economic Collapse is a very important book that must be read now because the alternative is that we never see these ideas realized. As we all focus on beating Obama, Jim DeMint has articulated a substantive agenda to replace him. And it is just in time.
http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/a-modern-conservative-manifesto/
Monday, January 3, 2011
Mon, January 3, 2011: CQ Roll Call Daily Briefing: Ignore the House for a Minute
Today In Washington
THE HOUSE AND SENATE: Neither is in session until Wednesday, when both will convene at noon for the start of the 112th Congress.
THE WHITE HOUSE: Obama is on the final full day of his Hawaiian vacation. He’s expected back in Washington tomorrow afternoon.
OPENING CEREMONIES: The first days of the year, on both sides of the Capitol, are shaping up to be much more about political tone-setting than about launching grand legislative drives.
Most of the attention, naturally enough, is being paid to how the Republicans are stage-managing their return to power in the House, from the subdued tone Boehner is setting for his ascent to the Speakership to the stately pace and modest expectations that his leadership team is setting for the party’s agenda. (The first spending cut the House will approve this week will be a drop-in-the-bucket $25 million, which will be marketed instead as a bold 5 percent reductions in the office budgets of all House members.)
What’s not gotten much attention, yet, is the potential for an opening day Senate showdown on filibuster rules. The Latin-infused rhetoric and parliamentary maneuvering will sound like a lot of insider mumbo jumbo to much of the nation. But making it more difficult for the minority party to block bills and nominees has the potential to narrow the partisan chasm and alter the way Congress does business much more than an annual recitation of the Constitution’s text on the House floor, which is being arranged by the GOP as a shout-out to the tea party faithful.
In the past two years, Reid had to spend an extraordinary amount of time honing his skill at breaking filibusters, which in the end he was able to do more often than any majority leader before him. But for more than a year now many of his fellow Democrats — mostly first-termers led by Missouri’s Claire McCaskill and New Mexico’s Tom Udall — have been mulling over what’s their highest-percentage shot at a rules change that would weaken the filibuster. They have not yet shown their cards, but they’re expected to make their move this week in the belief that precedent should allow them to get whatever change they want with a simple majority vote (in other words, the GOP won’t be able to block them) if they act right at the start of the new Congress.
Slightly reducing the supermajority of 60 required to invoke cloture, doing away with the power to mount a filibuster on the motion to begin debating a bill, or maybe just requiring senators to make good on their filibusters the old-fashioned way — by standing in the well and talking all night — would all tend to force the weakened minority to be more willing to compromise on legislation. It would not, however, do anything to speed the ratification of treaties, which will still need a two-thirds vote.
SHAVE AND A HAIRCUT: Republicans already are conceding that they will be unable to make good on their highest-profile aspiration, repealing the new health care law, because there’s no way the Senate will go along even if there’s a veto-proof majority for doing so in the House. (Michigan’s Fred Upton, the new Energy and Commerce chairman, yesterday predicted at least a two-third majority for total repeal and said the House vote would come before the State of the Union address, which Obama is likely to deliver Jan. 25.)
Absent outright repeal, the GOP strategy is to pick away at the health overhaul’s most contentious provisions through a combination of hearings, narrow legislation and — probably most effective of all — single-line amendments to spending bills that prevent the spending of any money to carry out a narrow provisions of law, or the regulations to carry it out.
One of the first efforts will be to try to prevent Medicare bureaucrats from spending money on their new regulation designed to promote discussions about end-of-life issues between doctors and patients — the sort of talks that were going to be written into the law, but got dropped, after Sarah Palin famously derided the idea as leading to the creation of government “death panels.”
THE FIELD NARROWS: Only four of the people who want to replace Michael Steele as the Republican Party’s national chairman will be debating him at the National Press Club at lunchtime. That’s because the fifth would-be challenger — Gentry Collins, who stepped down as RNC political director just after the election — dropped out of the race overnight.
The front-runner is clearly anybody but Steele, whose support has been sagging in the runup to Friday’s voting at the party bosses’ annual winter meeting. The man to beat has been Wisconsin GOP chairman Reince Priebus, but his star has faded the longer people ponder that he was once Steele’s general counsel. (Two of the chairman’s current top aides, chief of staff Mike Leavitt and spokesman Doug Heye, are on their way out of GOP headquarters even if their boss scores an upset win for a second term.) The remaining candidates for party chairman are former Missouri party chief Ann Wagner, onetime GOP convention chief executive Maria Cino, and former Michigan party chairman Saul Anuzis.
TAMPA TICK-TOCK: The new year signals the unfettered, unambiguous start to the 2012 presidential campaign — with almost all the attention focused on maneuvering by the Republicans who could form a potentially enormous and fractious field of would-be Obama challenges. (One of them will be nominated on Florida’s Gulf Coast fully 20 months from now.)
The big New Year’s weekend coup went to Mitt Romney, who secured the endorsement of the senior senator from a crucial early primary state: South Carolina’s Lindsey Graham, as he prepares to seek a third term in his own right next year, apparently has concluded he’s not going to go out of his way to curry favor with the tea party crowd by endorsing someone more overtly and reliably conservative. Someone like, for example, the state’s other senator, Jim DeMint, who is among the huge GOP crowd still toying with the idea of a White House run.
As for Sarah Palin — whose own intentions continue to mystify GOP professionals — she continued to get attention for intensifying her connection to a state in the Lower 48. A week after word that her daughter Bristol paid $172,000 for a five-bedroom house in the hard-hit-by-foreclosures Phoenix suburb of Maricopa, a Palin acolyte has been named chief of staff to one of Arizona’s three new Republican congressmen: Paul Gosar of Flagstaff. The new top aide, Rob Robinson, has been a dentist just like his new boss. It was Robinson who introduced Gosar to the former Alaska governor, who ended up giving him a pivotal endorsement.
— David Hawkings, editor
Become a Facebook fan at facebook.com/DavidHawkingsDC. Or follow me on Twitter at twitter.com/davidhawkings.
THE HOUSE AND SENATE: Neither is in session until Wednesday, when both will convene at noon for the start of the 112th Congress.
THE WHITE HOUSE: Obama is on the final full day of his Hawaiian vacation. He’s expected back in Washington tomorrow afternoon.
OPENING CEREMONIES: The first days of the year, on both sides of the Capitol, are shaping up to be much more about political tone-setting than about launching grand legislative drives.
Most of the attention, naturally enough, is being paid to how the Republicans are stage-managing their return to power in the House, from the subdued tone Boehner is setting for his ascent to the Speakership to the stately pace and modest expectations that his leadership team is setting for the party’s agenda. (The first spending cut the House will approve this week will be a drop-in-the-bucket $25 million, which will be marketed instead as a bold 5 percent reductions in the office budgets of all House members.)
What’s not gotten much attention, yet, is the potential for an opening day Senate showdown on filibuster rules. The Latin-infused rhetoric and parliamentary maneuvering will sound like a lot of insider mumbo jumbo to much of the nation. But making it more difficult for the minority party to block bills and nominees has the potential to narrow the partisan chasm and alter the way Congress does business much more than an annual recitation of the Constitution’s text on the House floor, which is being arranged by the GOP as a shout-out to the tea party faithful.
In the past two years, Reid had to spend an extraordinary amount of time honing his skill at breaking filibusters, which in the end he was able to do more often than any majority leader before him. But for more than a year now many of his fellow Democrats — mostly first-termers led by Missouri’s Claire McCaskill and New Mexico’s Tom Udall — have been mulling over what’s their highest-percentage shot at a rules change that would weaken the filibuster. They have not yet shown their cards, but they’re expected to make their move this week in the belief that precedent should allow them to get whatever change they want with a simple majority vote (in other words, the GOP won’t be able to block them) if they act right at the start of the new Congress.
Slightly reducing the supermajority of 60 required to invoke cloture, doing away with the power to mount a filibuster on the motion to begin debating a bill, or maybe just requiring senators to make good on their filibusters the old-fashioned way — by standing in the well and talking all night — would all tend to force the weakened minority to be more willing to compromise on legislation. It would not, however, do anything to speed the ratification of treaties, which will still need a two-thirds vote.
SHAVE AND A HAIRCUT: Republicans already are conceding that they will be unable to make good on their highest-profile aspiration, repealing the new health care law, because there’s no way the Senate will go along even if there’s a veto-proof majority for doing so in the House. (Michigan’s Fred Upton, the new Energy and Commerce chairman, yesterday predicted at least a two-third majority for total repeal and said the House vote would come before the State of the Union address, which Obama is likely to deliver Jan. 25.)
Absent outright repeal, the GOP strategy is to pick away at the health overhaul’s most contentious provisions through a combination of hearings, narrow legislation and — probably most effective of all — single-line amendments to spending bills that prevent the spending of any money to carry out a narrow provisions of law, or the regulations to carry it out.
One of the first efforts will be to try to prevent Medicare bureaucrats from spending money on their new regulation designed to promote discussions about end-of-life issues between doctors and patients — the sort of talks that were going to be written into the law, but got dropped, after Sarah Palin famously derided the idea as leading to the creation of government “death panels.”
THE FIELD NARROWS: Only four of the people who want to replace Michael Steele as the Republican Party’s national chairman will be debating him at the National Press Club at lunchtime. That’s because the fifth would-be challenger — Gentry Collins, who stepped down as RNC political director just after the election — dropped out of the race overnight.
The front-runner is clearly anybody but Steele, whose support has been sagging in the runup to Friday’s voting at the party bosses’ annual winter meeting. The man to beat has been Wisconsin GOP chairman Reince Priebus, but his star has faded the longer people ponder that he was once Steele’s general counsel. (Two of the chairman’s current top aides, chief of staff Mike Leavitt and spokesman Doug Heye, are on their way out of GOP headquarters even if their boss scores an upset win for a second term.) The remaining candidates for party chairman are former Missouri party chief Ann Wagner, onetime GOP convention chief executive Maria Cino, and former Michigan party chairman Saul Anuzis.
TAMPA TICK-TOCK: The new year signals the unfettered, unambiguous start to the 2012 presidential campaign — with almost all the attention focused on maneuvering by the Republicans who could form a potentially enormous and fractious field of would-be Obama challenges. (One of them will be nominated on Florida’s Gulf Coast fully 20 months from now.)
The big New Year’s weekend coup went to Mitt Romney, who secured the endorsement of the senior senator from a crucial early primary state: South Carolina’s Lindsey Graham, as he prepares to seek a third term in his own right next year, apparently has concluded he’s not going to go out of his way to curry favor with the tea party crowd by endorsing someone more overtly and reliably conservative. Someone like, for example, the state’s other senator, Jim DeMint, who is among the huge GOP crowd still toying with the idea of a White House run.
As for Sarah Palin — whose own intentions continue to mystify GOP professionals — she continued to get attention for intensifying her connection to a state in the Lower 48. A week after word that her daughter Bristol paid $172,000 for a five-bedroom house in the hard-hit-by-foreclosures Phoenix suburb of Maricopa, a Palin acolyte has been named chief of staff to one of Arizona’s three new Republican congressmen: Paul Gosar of Flagstaff. The new top aide, Rob Robinson, has been a dentist just like his new boss. It was Robinson who introduced Gosar to the former Alaska governor, who ended up giving him a pivotal endorsement.
— David Hawkings, editor
Become a Facebook fan at facebook.com/DavidHawkingsDC. Or follow me on Twitter at twitter.com/davidhawkings.
Thursday, December 16, 2010
Washington Examiner Editorial
Lame-duck Dems jam spending bill with 6,600 earmarks
By: Examiner Editorial 12/15/10 8:05 PM
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his allies are using the lame duck to push $1.2 trillion in spending. Gallup released a historic poll yesterday: The Democrat-controlled 111th Congress, now in its final, lame-duck session, is the most unpopular in the history of the pollster's surveys.
Given this week's events, it's not hard to see why. House Democrats' massive resistance to a popular, bipartisan package to prevent gargantuan income tax increases on all taxpayers in January shows they learned nothing from the 2010 election in which voters handed control of the lower chamber back to Republicans. The lame ducks keep acting as if they are still the top drakes in town, oblivious to the fact they were plucked and roasted by the voters on Nov. 2.
But if liberal intransigence in the House on taxes evinces a Congress that is "not getting it," leading Senate Democrats are going their colleagues one better by introducing a $1.2 trillion omnibus spending bill that represents an act of stupefying political arrogance. This omnibus bill exemplifies a Democratic Congress that has been so preoccupied this year with its exceedingly unpopular legislative agenda that it failed to do its basic job: funding government. The Democrats who led the Senate and House refused to even pass a budget, as required by law and the Constitution, but now that they are losing power, they want one more spending spectacular before their terms end.
The 2,000-page omnibus bill contains 6,600 earmarks worth $8.3 billion, including funds for such national priorities as termite research and for a charity tied to the late House Democratic porkmeister John Murtha. The omnibus also funds Obamacare. It increases spending from last year's levels in a number of departments, immediately after an election in which runaway government spending was such a huge issue. Even worse, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his colleagues pushing this bill presented it as a political gun to the head for Senate Republicans who know the government will shut down if something isn't done by Saturday.
Senate Republicans and similarly responsible Democrats should reject the omnibus, as well as any other last-minute spending package introduced by the discredited leaders of the 111th Congress. With the tax-cut compromise headed toward final passage, the only appropriate spending measure for the lame-duck Senate to consider is one that funds the government at current levels until the new Congress is sworn in to start cleaning up the mess. Then they should go home.
If they don't, Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., should, as he promised, demand a reading on the Senate floor of the full text of the omnibus and the proposed New START treaty, in order to slow-walk the irresponsible 111th Congress and prevent it from doing any more damage to the nation.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2010/12/examiner-editorial-lame-duck-dems-jam-spending-bill-6600-earmarks?sms_ss=facebook&at_xt=4d0a045b6872ab87%2C0#ixzz18HF1xGJU
By: Examiner Editorial 12/15/10 8:05 PM
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his allies are using the lame duck to push $1.2 trillion in spending. Gallup released a historic poll yesterday: The Democrat-controlled 111th Congress, now in its final, lame-duck session, is the most unpopular in the history of the pollster's surveys.
Given this week's events, it's not hard to see why. House Democrats' massive resistance to a popular, bipartisan package to prevent gargantuan income tax increases on all taxpayers in January shows they learned nothing from the 2010 election in which voters handed control of the lower chamber back to Republicans. The lame ducks keep acting as if they are still the top drakes in town, oblivious to the fact they were plucked and roasted by the voters on Nov. 2.
But if liberal intransigence in the House on taxes evinces a Congress that is "not getting it," leading Senate Democrats are going their colleagues one better by introducing a $1.2 trillion omnibus spending bill that represents an act of stupefying political arrogance. This omnibus bill exemplifies a Democratic Congress that has been so preoccupied this year with its exceedingly unpopular legislative agenda that it failed to do its basic job: funding government. The Democrats who led the Senate and House refused to even pass a budget, as required by law and the Constitution, but now that they are losing power, they want one more spending spectacular before their terms end.
The 2,000-page omnibus bill contains 6,600 earmarks worth $8.3 billion, including funds for such national priorities as termite research and for a charity tied to the late House Democratic porkmeister John Murtha. The omnibus also funds Obamacare. It increases spending from last year's levels in a number of departments, immediately after an election in which runaway government spending was such a huge issue. Even worse, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his colleagues pushing this bill presented it as a political gun to the head for Senate Republicans who know the government will shut down if something isn't done by Saturday.
Senate Republicans and similarly responsible Democrats should reject the omnibus, as well as any other last-minute spending package introduced by the discredited leaders of the 111th Congress. With the tax-cut compromise headed toward final passage, the only appropriate spending measure for the lame-duck Senate to consider is one that funds the government at current levels until the new Congress is sworn in to start cleaning up the mess. Then they should go home.
If they don't, Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., should, as he promised, demand a reading on the Senate floor of the full text of the omnibus and the proposed New START treaty, in order to slow-walk the irresponsible 111th Congress and prevent it from doing any more damage to the nation.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2010/12/examiner-editorial-lame-duck-dems-jam-spending-bill-6600-earmarks?sms_ss=facebook&at_xt=4d0a045b6872ab87%2C0#ixzz18HF1xGJU
Friday, December 10, 2010
Obama--Republican Compromise on Extending Tax Cuts
Message from a Club for Growth
On Monday, President Obama announced the compromise he reached with Republican congressional leaders, extending both the Bush tax cuts and unemployment benefits. As liberals shrieked in outrage, many conservatives assumed the deal must be pretty good.
It's not, and so far the people saying so the loudest have been the Club, and some of our PAC-endorsed superstars like Sen. Jim DeMint and Rep. Jeff Flake. Economic conservatives have been so fixated on extending the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 - a vital goal - that many have missed the underlying weaknesses of the deal cut on our behalf by Republican leaders.
1. The deal extends the marginal income tax rates, but resurrects the Death Tax from zero this year to 35 percent next year. Some people don't see this as a tax hike. We do.
2. The deal extends 99-week unemployment insurance benefits for another 13 months, at a cost of $56 billion, without offsets elsewhere in the budget. This would blow another huge hole in the deficit, just weeks after the American people demanded fiscal discipline at the polls. And it will keep the unemployment rate artificially high, leading to a protracted stall in the economy.
3. The employee-side Social Security tax cut is not only temporary, but also creates no incentive to hire, invest, and grow. This is Keynesian-style stimulus.
4. Finally, all of the tax cuts will only be extended a year or two, and history teaches we can't get permanent economic growth from temporary economic policy.
It's time Washington stopped monkeying around with temporary tax cuts and permanent spending. The pro-growth conservative Congress elected last month was sent to change Washington - that means flipping the mentality to temporary spending and permanent tax relief.
The Club's opposition to the deal has generated a lot of media interest, and I wanted to give you a chance to see what I've been up to.
Click here to see me on Cavuto: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14577&utm_source=Club+for+Growth&utm_campaign=3d0c3426e2-10_12_09_Weekly_Email_i101209A&utm_medium=email
Click here to see me on The Kudlow Report: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14576&utm_source=Club+for+Growth&utm_campaign=3d0c3426e2-10_12_09_Weekly_Email_i101209A&utm_medium=email
As we said Monday, the tax compromise is bad policy, bad politics, and a bad deal for the American people. We're going to fight it, and I hope you will continue to help us wage and win fights for economic growth and freedom over the next two years. I know you won't let up. Neither will we.
Please consider making a donation today.
Thank you, again, as always.
Best regards,
Chris Chocola
President, Club for Growth
2001 L Street, NW, Ste 600
Washington, DC 20036
PH: 202-955-5500
On Monday, President Obama announced the compromise he reached with Republican congressional leaders, extending both the Bush tax cuts and unemployment benefits. As liberals shrieked in outrage, many conservatives assumed the deal must be pretty good.
It's not, and so far the people saying so the loudest have been the Club, and some of our PAC-endorsed superstars like Sen. Jim DeMint and Rep. Jeff Flake. Economic conservatives have been so fixated on extending the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 - a vital goal - that many have missed the underlying weaknesses of the deal cut on our behalf by Republican leaders.
1. The deal extends the marginal income tax rates, but resurrects the Death Tax from zero this year to 35 percent next year. Some people don't see this as a tax hike. We do.
2. The deal extends 99-week unemployment insurance benefits for another 13 months, at a cost of $56 billion, without offsets elsewhere in the budget. This would blow another huge hole in the deficit, just weeks after the American people demanded fiscal discipline at the polls. And it will keep the unemployment rate artificially high, leading to a protracted stall in the economy.
3. The employee-side Social Security tax cut is not only temporary, but also creates no incentive to hire, invest, and grow. This is Keynesian-style stimulus.
4. Finally, all of the tax cuts will only be extended a year or two, and history teaches we can't get permanent economic growth from temporary economic policy.
It's time Washington stopped monkeying around with temporary tax cuts and permanent spending. The pro-growth conservative Congress elected last month was sent to change Washington - that means flipping the mentality to temporary spending and permanent tax relief.
The Club's opposition to the deal has generated a lot of media interest, and I wanted to give you a chance to see what I've been up to.
Click here to see me on Cavuto: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14577&utm_source=Club+for+Growth&utm_campaign=3d0c3426e2-10_12_09_Weekly_Email_i101209A&utm_medium=email
Click here to see me on The Kudlow Report: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14576&utm_source=Club+for+Growth&utm_campaign=3d0c3426e2-10_12_09_Weekly_Email_i101209A&utm_medium=email
As we said Monday, the tax compromise is bad policy, bad politics, and a bad deal for the American people. We're going to fight it, and I hope you will continue to help us wage and win fights for economic growth and freedom over the next two years. I know you won't let up. Neither will we.
Please consider making a donation today.
Thank you, again, as always.
Best regards,
Chris Chocola
President, Club for Growth
2001 L Street, NW, Ste 600
Washington, DC 20036
PH: 202-955-5500
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
