An Israeli newspaper is reporting that the U.S. blocked Israel’s participation in a meeting of the State Department’s flagship counterterrorism project, the Global Counterterrorism Forum (GCTF). Considering Israel’s vast experience in fighting terror as a result of its frequent targeting by Palestinian terrorism, it’s surprising that Israel would be excluded from the meeting which took place on Friday in Istanbul. Globes reports:
A pro-Israeli source in Washington told “Globes” that Israel was excluded from the meeting because of fierce objections by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Israel tried hard to obtain an invitation to the meeting, and its exclusion, despite the tight US-Israeli intelligence ties, has greatly disappointed officials in Jerusalem.
The GCTF, one of the pillars of President Barack Obama’s antiterrorism campaign, was established in September 2011. The White House calls the forum as a wise use of force against terrorism, and chose Turkey as the forum’s joint chair, together with the US.
CONTINUED: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-the-obama-admin-intentionally-exclude-israel-from-a-major-counterterrorism-conference/
Showing posts with label global. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Common Core Madness: Brainwashing Kindergartners Into Believing Global Warming Hoax Mandatory?
Apparently, it is, if your state buys into 'Common Core' standards (and NC does).
Why would we sit idly by when the Marxists in control of our Government Marxism Indoctrination Centers Public Schools prepare the minds of our children to reject the the scientific method, in favor of Marxist 'Anthropogenic Climate Change' Hoax propaganda ('Global Warming' propaganda)? Why are we allowing Marxists to control the schools at which our children, our neighbors' children, and the future of our nation, are educated, at all? We just dominated in Wisconsin, despite whatever massive voter fraud the Democrats engaged in, in their desperate attempt to regain lost power. Why are we letting them continue to brainwash our children, grandchildren, and the kids & grandkids of Americans who aren't yet awake?
CONTINUED: http://www.the912project.us/forum/topic/show?id=2881797%3ATopic%3A2581083&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic
Why would we sit idly by when the Marxists in control of our Government Marxism Indoctrination Centers Public Schools prepare the minds of our children to reject the the scientific method, in favor of Marxist 'Anthropogenic Climate Change' Hoax propaganda ('Global Warming' propaganda)? Why are we allowing Marxists to control the schools at which our children, our neighbors' children, and the future of our nation, are educated, at all? We just dominated in Wisconsin, despite whatever massive voter fraud the Democrats engaged in, in their desperate attempt to regain lost power. Why are we letting them continue to brainwash our children, grandchildren, and the kids & grandkids of Americans who aren't yet awake?
CONTINUED: http://www.the912project.us/forum/topic/show?id=2881797%3ATopic%3A2581083&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
A CALL TO ACTION--A Message from Tea Party Patriots
This week:
Insisting Republican Senators Uphold American Values and Interests by OPPOSING LOST ( the Law of the Sea Treaty)!
PASSION: This treaty is designed to get more money from the U.S. to fund Left-wing globalist projects which are rarely in the interest of the United States. The proposed treaty also nibbles away at U.S. sovereignty which now extends to the outer edge of the Continental shelf. Potential revenues from mining resources in the seabed may run to trillions of dollars. Why should we give control of this area, important to us for both financial and security reasons, to the United Nations, the vast majority of whose members are openly hostile to us and to our interests?
ACTION: Today's passion to action focuses on those Senators who have not signed the letter from Senator Inhofe to Majority Leader Harry Reid, declaring their opposition to the LOST Treaty. We are demanding that they sign immediately. Start calling now and don’t stop until they do. Go team: let’s melt the phone lines to our senators’ offices.
Insisting Republican Senators Uphold American Values and Interests by OPPOSING LOST ( the Law of the Sea Treaty)!
PASSION: This treaty is designed to get more money from the U.S. to fund Left-wing globalist projects which are rarely in the interest of the United States. The proposed treaty also nibbles away at U.S. sovereignty which now extends to the outer edge of the Continental shelf. Potential revenues from mining resources in the seabed may run to trillions of dollars. Why should we give control of this area, important to us for both financial and security reasons, to the United Nations, the vast majority of whose members are openly hostile to us and to our interests?
ACTION: Today's passion to action focuses on those Senators who have not signed the letter from Senator Inhofe to Majority Leader Harry Reid, declaring their opposition to the LOST Treaty. We are demanding that they sign immediately. Start calling now and don’t stop until they do. Go team: let’s melt the phone lines to our senators’ offices.
Sunday, March 4, 2012
UN to propose planetary regulations of water, food
Written By Kelley Vlahos
Published March 01, 2012--FoxNews.com
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/03/01/un-to-propose-planetary-regulations-water-food/?test=latestnews#ixzz1o4JkSlRi
An environmental report issued by an agency of the United Nations last month has some critics sounding the alarm, saying it is a clarion call for "global governance" over how the Earth is managed.
The report, “21 Issues for the 21st Century,” from the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Foresight Process, is the culmination of a two-year deliberative process involving 22 core scientists. It is expected to receive considerable attention in the run-up to the Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, which will be held in Rio, Brazil, in June.
The scientists who wrote the report say it focuses on identifying emerging issues in the global environment, and that it is not about mandating solutions.
But its critics see an agenda lurking in its 60 pages, which call for a complete overhaul of how the world's food and water are created and distributed -- something the report says is “urgently needed” for the human race to keep feeding and hydrating itself safely.
“This is more utopianism, pie-in-the-sky pleading for ‘global governance,’ including what they acknowledge as ‘novel governance arrangements,’ including, ‘alliances between environmentalist and other civil society groups,’” charged Chris Horner, author of Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud and Deception to Keep You Misinformed, and a senior fellow for energy and environment at the free-market Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) in Washington, D.C.
We are not talking about a world government.
- Professor Oren Young
The Foresight Report suggests actions to save humanity from starvation, the overheating planet and the collapse of the world’s oceans -- options that include new “constitutional frameworks,” “international protocols” and a “shared vision” for land and water management that essentially rewire existing treaties and governments.
But the group insists it’s not a call for global governance.
“We are not talking about a world government,” said Dr. Oren Young, professor of institutional and international governance and environmental institutions at the University of California at Santa Barbara, and one of the scientists who issued the report.
He said the panel’s conversations included questions like, “How do we resolve these problems without creating this monster entity?”
Young said the panel wasn’t tasked with finding all the answers.
“We realize that government can be part of the problem,” he told FoxNews.com. “But we can’t close our eyes and say, ‘oh well, everything will work out,’ without us even looking at it.”
Even environmentalists don’t believe that planet-wide accords are particularly popular.
“I don’t think there is a global appetite right now for new institutions … or a world environmental organization like we have, say, with the World Trade Organization,” said Janet Redman, co-director of the Sustainable Energy and Economy Network at the progressive Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C.
“There are a lot of places -- especially the oceans and food security -- where everyone is saying that doing this piecemeal is not going to address the bigger sense of these environmental issues.”
But on the whole, she said, global government probably won’t work.
“I think everyone agrees this is not the right time,” Redman told FoxNews.com.
The State Dept. has already weighed in on many of the issues presented by the Foresight Panel in its own statement, titled “Sustainable Development for the Next Twenty Years United States Views on RIO+20.”
Submitted to the U.N by the Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (OIES) in November, this policy vision makes it clear the State Dept. will back global government solutions -- whether they be in addressing the overfishing of the oceans, making national laws and regulations more transparent, addressing land and ocean-based pollution, or water management.
The U.S. also is wholly supportive of strengthening the UNEP as “a body through which governments can cooperate to recommend environmental policies, promote best practices, and build national capacity for governance, monitoring and assessment,” according to the vision statement.
Yet UNEP is unsuited for that, by the agency’s own admission.
An internal U.N study obtained by Fox News last June found that the $450 million organization is an administrative mess, not knowing how its money is spent or how many public and private partners it might be working with at any given time.
Questions about the ability of nations to work with global bodies such as the U.N, and whether they should subscribe to transnational guidelines or mandates, will no doubt be a subject of concern in the run-up to the Rio summit.
Just as global governance solutions are raised in the report, so are local solutions that involve local governments, private industry and promoting individual and community shifts in the way people live and tend to the environment in their daily lives and workplaces.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/03/01/un-to-propose-planetary-regulations-water-food/?test=latestnews#ixzz1o4KF4wD6
Published March 01, 2012--FoxNews.com
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/03/01/un-to-propose-planetary-regulations-water-food/?test=latestnews#ixzz1o4JkSlRi
An environmental report issued by an agency of the United Nations last month has some critics sounding the alarm, saying it is a clarion call for "global governance" over how the Earth is managed.
The report, “21 Issues for the 21st Century,” from the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Foresight Process, is the culmination of a two-year deliberative process involving 22 core scientists. It is expected to receive considerable attention in the run-up to the Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, which will be held in Rio, Brazil, in June.
The scientists who wrote the report say it focuses on identifying emerging issues in the global environment, and that it is not about mandating solutions.
But its critics see an agenda lurking in its 60 pages, which call for a complete overhaul of how the world's food and water are created and distributed -- something the report says is “urgently needed” for the human race to keep feeding and hydrating itself safely.
“This is more utopianism, pie-in-the-sky pleading for ‘global governance,’ including what they acknowledge as ‘novel governance arrangements,’ including, ‘alliances between environmentalist and other civil society groups,’” charged Chris Horner, author of Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud and Deception to Keep You Misinformed, and a senior fellow for energy and environment at the free-market Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) in Washington, D.C.
We are not talking about a world government.
- Professor Oren Young
The Foresight Report suggests actions to save humanity from starvation, the overheating planet and the collapse of the world’s oceans -- options that include new “constitutional frameworks,” “international protocols” and a “shared vision” for land and water management that essentially rewire existing treaties and governments.
But the group insists it’s not a call for global governance.
“We are not talking about a world government,” said Dr. Oren Young, professor of institutional and international governance and environmental institutions at the University of California at Santa Barbara, and one of the scientists who issued the report.
He said the panel’s conversations included questions like, “How do we resolve these problems without creating this monster entity?”
Young said the panel wasn’t tasked with finding all the answers.
“We realize that government can be part of the problem,” he told FoxNews.com. “But we can’t close our eyes and say, ‘oh well, everything will work out,’ without us even looking at it.”
Even environmentalists don’t believe that planet-wide accords are particularly popular.
“I don’t think there is a global appetite right now for new institutions … or a world environmental organization like we have, say, with the World Trade Organization,” said Janet Redman, co-director of the Sustainable Energy and Economy Network at the progressive Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C.
“There are a lot of places -- especially the oceans and food security -- where everyone is saying that doing this piecemeal is not going to address the bigger sense of these environmental issues.”
But on the whole, she said, global government probably won’t work.
“I think everyone agrees this is not the right time,” Redman told FoxNews.com.
The State Dept. has already weighed in on many of the issues presented by the Foresight Panel in its own statement, titled “Sustainable Development for the Next Twenty Years United States Views on RIO+20.”
Submitted to the U.N by the Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (OIES) in November, this policy vision makes it clear the State Dept. will back global government solutions -- whether they be in addressing the overfishing of the oceans, making national laws and regulations more transparent, addressing land and ocean-based pollution, or water management.
The U.S. also is wholly supportive of strengthening the UNEP as “a body through which governments can cooperate to recommend environmental policies, promote best practices, and build national capacity for governance, monitoring and assessment,” according to the vision statement.
Yet UNEP is unsuited for that, by the agency’s own admission.
An internal U.N study obtained by Fox News last June found that the $450 million organization is an administrative mess, not knowing how its money is spent or how many public and private partners it might be working with at any given time.
Questions about the ability of nations to work with global bodies such as the U.N, and whether they should subscribe to transnational guidelines or mandates, will no doubt be a subject of concern in the run-up to the Rio summit.
Just as global governance solutions are raised in the report, so are local solutions that involve local governments, private industry and promoting individual and community shifts in the way people live and tend to the environment in their daily lives and workplaces.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/03/01/un-to-propose-planetary-regulations-water-food/?test=latestnews#ixzz1o4KF4wD6
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Randy's Right
What Happens When the Banks Close Their Doors By David DeGerolamo
The following articles dealing with banks are all less than three weeks old. While we are focusing on the emergence of “Democracy” in Egypt, a global financial collapse is ignored and our stock market seems to be unstoppable even though the daily trading volume is less than half what it was in 2008. Spain, Portugal, Italy and Iceland banks were not included below since their bank crisis is well documented. I included Ireland to show the relationship between bank failures and elections. The cost of food and energy becomes irrelevant when the banks close their doors.
http://randysright.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/what-happens-when-the-banks-close-their-doors-by-david-degerolamo/
The following articles dealing with banks are all less than three weeks old. While we are focusing on the emergence of “Democracy” in Egypt, a global financial collapse is ignored and our stock market seems to be unstoppable even though the daily trading volume is less than half what it was in 2008. Spain, Portugal, Italy and Iceland banks were not included below since their bank crisis is well documented. I included Ireland to show the relationship between bank failures and elections. The cost of food and energy becomes irrelevant when the banks close their doors.
http://randysright.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/what-happens-when-the-banks-close-their-doors-by-david-degerolamo/
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Climate absurdity: Illegal immigration caused by warming?
Just when you think you've heard everything, we're told that impoverished Mexicans are fleeing north to escape global warming.
According to a new study in the "prestigious" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, they are leaving because of climate change! And the problem will only get worse, as more farms and water supplies dry up. By 2080, up to 6.7 million Mexican campesinos could be heading north, to escape droughts worse than anything since the Nature-driven Dust Bowl or Anasazi and Mayan desiccations.
Yes, we could have a disaster and mass northward migration, if the climate really did warm 5 or 10 degrees, as some computer models, computer games, Hollywood movies and "prestigious" researchers say it might. Or if space aliens landed in Mexico and stole all the water? Give me a break. Enough with the ridiculous what-if computer scenarios. Anyone can manufacture "scenarios." They mean nothing. They are "evidence" or "proof" of nothing, except overly active imaginations.
http://www.cfact.org/a/1853/Climate-of-absurdity-Illegal-immigration-caused-by-warming
According to a new study in the "prestigious" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, they are leaving because of climate change! And the problem will only get worse, as more farms and water supplies dry up. By 2080, up to 6.7 million Mexican campesinos could be heading north, to escape droughts worse than anything since the Nature-driven Dust Bowl or Anasazi and Mayan desiccations.
Yes, we could have a disaster and mass northward migration, if the climate really did warm 5 or 10 degrees, as some computer models, computer games, Hollywood movies and "prestigious" researchers say it might. Or if space aliens landed in Mexico and stole all the water? Give me a break. Enough with the ridiculous what-if computer scenarios. Anyone can manufacture "scenarios." They mean nothing. They are "evidence" or "proof" of nothing, except overly active imaginations.
http://www.cfact.org/a/1853/Climate-of-absurdity-Illegal-immigration-caused-by-warming
Monday, September 6, 2010
REAL WORLD ALERT…Randy’s Right Obtains Classified Info Global Emergency Management on US Soil
Randy’s Right Obtains Classified Info Global Emergency Management on US Soil
http://randysright.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/real-world-alert-randys-right-obtains-clasified-info-global-emergency-management-on-us-soil/
http://randysright.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/real-world-alert-randys-right-obtains-clasified-info-global-emergency-management-on-us-soil/
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Senate Bill S510
Senate bill on homegrown food equals homegrown tyranny
August 14th, 2010 4:51 pm
.The Obama regime and Democrats in Congress want to prevent citizens from growing, sharing, trading, or selling homegrown food. Senate bill S510 would make such activity illegal. Such legislation amounts to homegrown tyranny, yet another example of how this government has declared war on the citizens.
Read the story: http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/senate-bill-on-homegrown-food-equals-homegrown-tyranny
August 14th, 2010 4:51 pm
.The Obama regime and Democrats in Congress want to prevent citizens from growing, sharing, trading, or selling homegrown food. Senate bill S510 would make such activity illegal. Such legislation amounts to homegrown tyranny, yet another example of how this government has declared war on the citizens.
Read the story: http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/senate-bill-on-homegrown-food-equals-homegrown-tyranny
Friday, June 18, 2010
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
ALERT-- CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES: OPPOSE S1733: Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act
S1733: Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act
This is the so-called Kerry-Boxer bill that proposes a cap and trade regime and would require emissions curbs of 20 percent by 2020 and 83 percent by 2050.
BP has been involved in the writing of this bill. The administration and liberal Congress are using the BP oil spill to their advantage and to advance their agenda.
Why You Should Oppose the “American Power Act”:
• The Legislation includes a “Fuels’ Fee” that is in fact a $.27 Tax per Gallon of Gasoline
• The Bill is really just another Cap and Trade Scheme in disguise.
• It’s a jobs killer in the industrial Midwest and across the country.
• It’s an energy tax, hitting the poor and middleclass the hardest.
• It creates a brand new government slush fund for Washington to spend.
• It’s the largest tax increase ever.
• It will needlessly export more American jobs to China, India and other countries.
• It will do nothing to impact global climate temperatures.
Below are related bills and resolutions H.R. 2454: American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (Passed House) and H.R. 2998: American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (Introduced). For more information, see Climate Change Legislation: Where Does it Stand?
http://www.govtrackinsider.com/articles/2010-04-27/climate-change
This is the so-called Kerry-Boxer bill that proposes a cap and trade regime and would require emissions curbs of 20 percent by 2020 and 83 percent by 2050.
BP has been involved in the writing of this bill. The administration and liberal Congress are using the BP oil spill to their advantage and to advance their agenda.
Why You Should Oppose the “American Power Act”:
• The Legislation includes a “Fuels’ Fee” that is in fact a $.27 Tax per Gallon of Gasoline
• The Bill is really just another Cap and Trade Scheme in disguise.
• It’s a jobs killer in the industrial Midwest and across the country.
• It’s an energy tax, hitting the poor and middleclass the hardest.
• It creates a brand new government slush fund for Washington to spend.
• It’s the largest tax increase ever.
• It will needlessly export more American jobs to China, India and other countries.
• It will do nothing to impact global climate temperatures.
Below are related bills and resolutions H.R. 2454: American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (Passed House) and H.R. 2998: American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (Introduced). For more information, see Climate Change Legislation: Where Does it Stand?
http://www.govtrackinsider.com/articles/2010-04-27/climate-change
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
