Coastal Carolina Taxpayers Association (CCTA)

Conservative News & Views, and the latest Action Alerts in the fight for our country! CCTA is the "Tea Party" movement in Carteret, Craven, Pamilico and Jones counties, NC. Everyone is welcome!

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Beaufort County Conservative Republican Club Meeting

Thursday, February 9, 2012, Food at 6:00 pm, Program at 6:45 pm
Mount Olive College, US 264 West of Washington, NC

Dinner is $6.00 for Pizza, Salad and Drink.

  • Mattie Lawson--Candidate for NC House District 6 andother candidates will be there for Q&A
  • More on Beaufort County Health Department
  • Local politics, budget, fraud
  • Discussion on Constitutional Forum
Please bring a friend, you do not have to be a member to attend. Call 975-3472 for more information.

Think about it.......

"The house of representatives ... can make no law which will not have its full operation on themselves and their friends, as well as the great mass of society. This has always been deemed one of the strongest bonds by which human policy can connect the rulers and the people together. It creates between them that communion of interest, and sympathy of sentiments, of which few governments have furnished examples; but without which every government degenerates into tyranny." --James Madison, Federalist No. 57, 1788

Wilson NC Tea Party Monthly Meeting Tonight

Time: February 2, 2012 from 6:30pm to 8:30pm

Location: Western Sizzlin Steak House
Organized By: Joel Killion

Purpose: To fellowship, encourage one another, strengthen communication, and strategize.

We meet EVERY month (unless otherwise noted on the EVENTS page of this website) and want to encourage everyone to come if they are interested in getting involved with their local Tea Party group. Together, as one, as a team, as a family, we can restore the dream of America, as delivered by God through the hearts and lives of our Founders and Framers.

Consider the following...

"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it." Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4,1777

"It is the common fate of the indolent to see their rights become a prey to the active. The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt." John Philpot Curran: Speech upon the Right of Election, 1790

"Maybe I did well and maybe I led the battle but nobody ever said we were going to win this thing at any point in time. Eternal vigilance is required and there have to be people who step up to the plate, who believe in liberty, and who are willing to fight for it." Milton Friedman, Economist


"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." Samuel Adams

"Voting is no substitute for the eternal vigilance that every friend of freedom must demonstrate towards government. If our freedom is to survive, Americans must become far better informed of the dangers from Washington -- regardless of who wins the Presidency." James Bovard

"No man is entitled to the blessings of freedom unless he be vigilant in its preservation." Gen. Douglas MacArthur

FREEDOM IS NOT FOR THE TIMID.

See more details and RSVP on Wilson NC Tea Party:
http://www.wilsonncteaparty.com/events/event/show?id=5407582%3AEvent%3A24403&xgi=2TMOeXrYyMNIGL&xg_source=msg_invite_event

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

MEMO: Obama ‘Recess’ appointments Unwarranted, Unnecessary and Unconstitutional

On January 4, President Obama purported to appoint three individuals to be members of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (two of whom were only nominated two weeks before and had not even completed the necessary questionnaire required by Senate) and one person to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). All of these positions require confirmation by the U.S. Senate.

ISSUE-IN-BRIEF: The Constitution allows the President to make “recess Appointments—bypassing the Senate under only one circumstance: “The President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate.” But the Senate did not adjourn its session and still had officers to receive nominations from the President. Again, the Constitution is very clear on this point: “Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days.” In December the House did not consent to the Senate taking a recess.



There are three objections to what are basically illegal appointments by President Obama:

CONTINUED:
http://netrightdaily.com/2012/02/memo-obama-recess-appointments-unwarranted-unnecessary-and-unconstitutional/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NetrightDaily+%28NetRight+Daily%29

The politics of who pays taxes

Why does Barack Obama play the politics of division on the income tax question? At the State of the Union Address Obama was at it again, quick to point out that “Warren Buffett pays a lower tax rate than his secretary.”

It’s not that hard to understand once one looks at the numbers. It’s less about who pays taxes, or how much they pay, than it is about who doesn’t. Most voting-age Americans do not pay income taxes — approximately 50.6 percent. That includes 53.91 million Americans who pay nothing in income taxes, and 64.7 million who get refunds in excess of what was owed. That’s 118.61 million out of 234.6 million Americans 18 years and older, based on data compiled by the Joint Committee on Taxation and the U.S. Census Bureau.


As a subset, the non-income taxpayers include 35.1 million who do pay payroll taxes but do not make enough or have enough deductions and credits that they do not have an income tax liability, based on data compiled by the Bureau of Labor Statistics showing 148.8 million Americans who have jobs full-time and part-time.

That leaves 116 million Americans who do pay income taxes, 49.4 percent of the voting-age population.

Further weighing the argument in his favor, when Obama talks about raising taxes on the upper-income brackets, he’s talking about just 3.9 million Americans who make $200,000 or more in Gross Adjusted Income according to the Internal Revenue Service. When he invokes the Buffett Rule, proposing raising capital gains taxes for those who earn more than $1 million, he’s only talking about 450,000 Americans.

That’s less than 2 percent of the voting-age population. And Obama’s betting that even if every single one of them voted against him, appealing to the 98 percent of voters whose tax rates would remain the same will help him get re-elected.

That is, if the tax rates of the wealthy become a front and center issue in the 2012 election. If they do, the political advantage will shift to Obama.

To disarm the Obama class warfare strategy, Republicans in 2012 will need to focus not on fairness in the tax code or over who pays taxes — which is to fight the battle on Obama’s terms — but to shine the spotlight on Obama’s lousy economic and fiscal record.

The fact is, the Obama economy has failed to create enough jobs to even keep pace with the growth of the population. Since Obama took office, the civilian labor force participation rate has dropped from 65.7 percent to just 64 percent, resulting in a loss of about 4 million people from being counted as unemployed even though they are of working age — because they’ve given up.

If those 4 million were included in the labor force, the effective unemployment rate would be closer to 11 percent, and the underemployed rate 17 percent, instead of 8.5 and 15.2 percent, respectively. Overall, there’s about 27 million working age adults who cannot find full-time work but would like to.

CONTINUED:
http://netrightdaily.com/2012/02/the-politics-of-who-pays-taxes/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NetrightDaily+%28NetRight+Daily%29

Sen. Mike Lee: The Inconvenient Constitution

As a United States Senator, I have sworn an oath to support, defend, and bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States. Complying with this Oath is not always convenient. Sometimes this requires voting against legislation that embodies policies I agree with, other times it requires taking a stand when doing so may not be popular. The Constitution itself is not a document of convenience. It specifies an onerous process – bicameralism and presentment – with which the government must comply to enact legislation. And it imposes separation of government powers and a system of checks and balances between the different branches.


Among those checks and balances is the requirement that the President’s nominations of federal judges and executive officers receive the Advice and Consent of the Senate before they take office, unless they are nominated during a Senate recess.


Events of the last few weeks show just how inconvenient the Constitution can be for politicians who want to get their way at any cost. On January 4, 2012, President Obama attempted to bypass the Senate and unilaterally “recess appoint” those nominees even though the Senate was not in fact in recess.


These are brazen actions with real consequences. As a duly sworn United States Senator I feel duty bound to resist these actions, regardless of the difficulty.


In taking a stand against the President’s unconstitutional assertion of executive power, I have already been targeted by the President himself. In his weekly radio address, the President singled me out, suggesting that I am playing politics with the judicial nominations process.


The Constitution is not partisan. I will oppose any president, regardless of party, who attempts to ignore constitutional limits on executive power. The Senate has an important role in the appointment of federal judges and officers. All members of Congress should be deeply concerned when the executive encroaches on that constitutional function.

CONTINUE READING:http://www.redstate.com/senmikelee/2012/01/31/the-inconvenient-constitution/

Representative Norman Sanderson Will Seek State Senate Seat

With the recent announcement that State Senator Jean Preston will not seek another term, her legislative colleague Norman Sanderson announced today that he will seek election to the District 2 State Senate seat. "Senator Preston has set the bar high when it comes to hard work, ethical standards and sound fiscal accountability," Sanderson said. "I assure the people of the 2nd District that I will uphold that legacy as I strive to be their next State Senator."


Sanderson has served Craven and Pamlico Counties in House District 3 and sees the move as a logical progression. "It has been my honor to serve the people of Craven and Pamlico Counties, and I look forward to expanding that service to the people of Carteret."

In the State House, Sanderson has distinguished himself as a "Common Sense Conservative", drawing on his business background and strong faith to guide him through one of the most difficult legislative sessions in memory. Sanderson plans to serve out his term in the House, honoring his commitment to his constituents.

Sanderson has already compiled an impressive list of local leaders who have thrown their support behind his candidacy. In addition to the formal endorsements, members of the area Republican Party leadership (prohibited from endorsing prior to filing) have expressed strong support for the Sanderson Senate run. "I am extremely pleased with the outpouring of support that has been directed toward my run for the State Senate," declared Sanderson.

From the Committee to Elect Norman Sanderson NC House