Showing posts with label debt ceiling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debt ceiling. Show all posts

Sunday, February 16, 2014

The debt ceiling: We were tricked, y’all!

The Daily Haymaker, by Brant Clifton, 
American Hustle is not just lighting up the movie screens.  It’s playing out on Capitol Hill as well.
Following last week’s disgraceful surrender by House Republicans on the debt ceiling, we got all kinds of stories about how Howard Coble was the only NCGOPer to vote for Boehner’s bill.  Actually, it appears that most Republicans voted to allow others to raise the debt limit, and then turned around and voted against the debt ceiling increase.  Like John Kerry, they were FOR it, before they were AGAINST it. 

How did this all go down? Pull up a chair.  Class is in session.

READ THE ARTICLE!

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

The Hill: House GOP abandons plans to tie debt ceiling to O-Care, Keystone

House Republican leaders have concluded that they cannot pass an increase in the debt ceiling without help from Democrats, abandoning plans to tie legislation either to ObamaCare or the Keystone pipeline.

GOP leaders had been looking at pairing legislation boosting the debt limit to either an authorization of the pipeline or rolling back a portion of ObamaCare. But after presenting those ideas to members and huddling Wednesday, they determined neither would receive 218 votes from House Republicans.

That left Republican leaders with no clear alternative to addressing the debt limit, which the Treasury Department has said needs to be raised by the end of February.

Instead, it now appears that a combination of Republicans and Democrats will be needed to get a debt-limit boost through the House.


Wednesday, January 23, 2013

House passes 'No Budget, No Pay,' sends to the Senate

The House on Wednesday put new pressure on the Senate to pass its first budget in nearly four years, by approving a bill that threatens to withhold senators' pay until that work is done. The House approved the No Budget, No Pay Act in a 285-144 vote.

Among Republicans, 33 voted against it to protest the absence of specific spending cuts in a bill that essentially extends the debt ceiling. But they were more than offset by the 86 Democrats who voted for the measure. The bill suspends the debt ceiling until May 18, and requires each chamber to pass a budget by April 15 or have its members face a suspension of pay.

Republicans are hoping the bill gives Congress a few months to find a longer-term debt ceiling agreement that includes significant spending cuts.


CONTINUED:  http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/278835-house-passes-no-budget-no-pay-sends-to-the-senate

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Morning Bell: Obama's Second Inaugural Address, Translated


Members of Congress—who are about to debate raising the debt ceiling tomorrow—should have paid attention yesterday. The President was very clear that he sees no urgency about reducing the debt and cutting the deficit. In fact, in his second inaugural address, President Barack Obama was honest about his intentions to grow government in order to remake our country along his progressive vision.

To sell his agenda, the President borrowed imagery and terminology from America’s first principles. But he twisted the American founding idea of “We the people” into the liberal “It takes a village.”

His rhetoric on the issues only thinly disguised his true meaning. Let’s translate some of his key points.

Obama on “we the people”: “For the American people can no more meet the demands of today’s world by acting alone than American soldiers could have met the forces of fascism or communism with muskets and militias. No single person can train all the math and science teachers we’ll need to equip our children for the future. Or build the roads and networks and research labs that will bring new jobs and businesses to our shores.”

Translation: In case you didn’t hear me the first time, you didn’t build that.

He may have surrounded these words with lip service to the Constitution and America’s promise of freedom, but the President revisited his core message here: It takes a taxpayer-subsidized village to build things. According to his philosophy, entrepreneurs don’t create jobs—the government does.

Obama on the fiscal crisis: “We, the people, understand that our country cannot succeed when a shrinking few do very well and a growing many barely make it….We must make the hard choices to reduce the cost of health care and the size of our deficit. But we reject the belief that America must choose between caring for the generation that built this country and investing in the generation that will build its future.”

Translation: I will continue to push for more tax increases instead of reforming Medicare and Social Security.

On this point, the President followed up his promise that he will not negotiate on the debt ceiling by digging in his heels on taxes and entitlement programs. The “hard choices” he refers to on health care and the deficit are more tax increases—because he “reject[s] the belief” that entitlements must be reformed if they are going to stay around for the next generation.

The debt limit showdown continues this week: The House will vote tomorrow on a plan that would extend the debt ceiling for three months while forcing Congress—specifically, the Senate—to pass a budget. If they do not pass a budget by April 15 under this plan, Members of Congress would stop getting paid. If House Republicans so much as blink, the President and his allies will steamroll them.

Obama on green energy: “We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations. Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms. The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult. But American cannot resist this transition.”

Translation: I will continue to increase regulations on the energy sources we use and throw taxpayer money into “green” energy companies.

Despite the ever-growing Green Graveyard of companies like Solyndra that took taxpayer money only to go bankrupt, the President clings to this unworkable and expensive policy. And his linking of climate change to “more powerful storms” points to a renewed push for policies like a carbon tax to punish people for using energy—a policy that would harm the economy and produce no tangible environmental benefits.

CONTINUED:  http://blog.heritage.org/2013/01/22/obama-second-inaugural-address-translated/?roi=echo3-14311016784-11072417-a3e3f8adf5427fe17a1d4872a039f499&utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell

Saturday, January 5, 2013

Tea Party Nation—Judson Phillips

The left’s dangerous fascination


What is this fascination the left has that is so dangerous?

The left loves dictators and dictatorships.

In recent days, leading members of the Party of Treason from Harry Reid to Nancy Pelosi have been demanding that Barack Obama simply ignore Congress and unilaterally raise the debt ceiling.

Barack Obama has told the House Republicans he will not debate with them on the debt ceiling. “To hell with you evil Republicans! I am a dictator and I will do what I damn well please!” That is Obama’s attitude.

And his attitude is meeting with thundering applause from the left.

Obama has wistfully told people that he wished he had the powers of a dictator. He has looked at people like Egypt’s Muslim brotherhood dictator Mohammad Morsi and wished he could act by decree like Morsi did.


The American left is becoming even more radical than it has been in the past. Only a few days ago, the Atlantic Magazine online published a piece calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment. And a few days earlier, a left wing nut job professor from Georgetown law school called for simply abolishing the Constitution.

That is what the left would ultimately like. They want to see our Constitution thrown on the garbage heap of history.

It is not just the Constitution that they hate. They hate the idea of liberty and freedom. They hate the idea that there should be any restrictions on the power of government.

The left believes that government should have the ultimate decisions for the “greater good.” They do not believe in the rights of freedom or conscience. They believe the government has the right to tell you what to do, what to believe and ultimately whether you even live or die.

The great difference between the liberty state that our founding fathers created and the liberal states we have seen throughout modern history is that role the person plays in society. In the liberty state, the person owns the state. The person is a citizen not a subject. The person is given rights by God that the state cannot take away.

In the states the left loves so much and wants us to emulate, the person is literally the property of the state. The state sets the parameters of all aspects of a person’s life.

One of the best examples of why we must fight liberalism is seen in Britain right now. Britain has the kind of socialist healthcare system that Barack Obama and the Party of Treason want America to have. They have a program called “Pathways.” It is a euthanasia program. Annually, 60,000 people are put on this program. Often their families are not even told. The people are denied food and water and they die. Often it is an agonizing death.

How is this possible?

CONTINUED: http://www.teapartynation.com/forum/topics/the-left-s-dangerous-fascination

Friday, December 7, 2012

How GOP Can Go on Offense in Budget Debate

This is indeed what the GOP should do!

Steve Forbes, Forbes

Mr. Speaker:  We are losing the cliff war in terms of public opinion, but the tables can be turned. A few days ago you offered tax increases via eliminating or capping deductions. Your generous gesture won no goodwill from Democrats and the mainstream media. Moreover any tax increase now only damages the economy. Concerning deductions, why give stuff away now for no real tax reform or simplification?


Here’s what the GOP should do now:

I. The House passes a bill extending for a year or at least six months all the cliff items – current income tax rates; the Alternative Minimum Tax patch; yes, even those Social Security payroll tax cuts. The whole kit and caboodle. The same with sequestration.

The point to make is that the U.S. economy is headed for a recession. One ill omen is that business investment is faltering. Any tax boost will be particularly perverse. Destroying capital and hurting small businesses will only contract the economy even more. We shouldn’t follow the bad examples of Western Europe and Japan. These countries are all raising taxes and the results are frightening. Japan’s economy is declining. Southern Europe is in a severe recession. France and Germany are about to go into recession. Britain just reported disappointing economic news and experts believe its economy will go into negative territory.

Another point to make – it is ridiculous to try to reform the tax code two weeks before Christmas. Ditto for entitlements.

About “the rich” label, polls show that if the question is rephrased as to whether the economy would be helped if upper-income couples had their tax bills increased substantially, most Americans are opposed to the hikes. We should learn how to phrase these issues instead of employing the Democrat’s vocabulary.

II. Turn the tables on the White House debt ceiling proposal by passing a bill mandating that Social Security trust fund assets – now held in useless, non-negotiable IOUs from the Treasury – be converted to marketable Treasury bonds which should have been done decades ago. That way if there is a debt ceiling impasse early next year Social Security and Medicare payments won’t be jeopardized. The trust funds could just sell on the open market bonds to raise the cash to make payments. Those trust funds are supposed to have more than $2 trillion in reserves. Instead, they are loaded with phony, illiquid assets.

CONTINUED:  http://www.forbes.com/sites/steveforbes/2012/12/06/message-to-gop-no-tax-increases-go-on-offense/

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Americans for Prosperity: Fall Issues Update

Congress is currently in the middle of its traditional August recess, but they will have a full agenda in September when they return. Tax reform, violating last year’s debt ceiling deal and health care are poised to dominate the policy discourse. We’ll continue to update you about critical developments as they occur.


Staying informed is pivotal to being a good activist. Click below to learn more from our sister organization, Americans for Prosperity Foundation, about these pressing issues for the fall.

Need to Know: Fiscal Cliff:  January 1, 2013 brings the expiration of the Bush era tax cuts; it will also usher in several new taxes from the President’s health care law. The dramatic increase in taxes will surely hit this weak economic recovery.

Need to Know: Medicare and IPAB:  Congressman Paul Ryan’s selection as the Republican vice-presidential candidate put a spotlight back on Medicare and the President’s use of a board of 15 unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats to control Medicare.

Need to Know: The Budget Control Act:  Last summer, Congress agreed to raise the debt ceiling in exchange for $1.2 trillion cuts in spending dubbed the sequester. Congress seems poised to undo their agreement from only a year ago.

Need to Know: Medicaid Expansion:  Following the Supreme Court’s ruling on health care, states now have the option whether to expand their broken, costly Medicaid system.


Sincerely,
Americans for Prosperity

Americans for Prosperity® (AFP) is a nationwide organization of citizen leaders committed to advancing every individual's right to economic freedom and opportunity. AFP believes reducing the size and scope of government is the best safeguard to ensuring individual productivity and prosperity for all Americans. AFP educates and engages citizens in support of restraining state and federal government growth, and returning government to its constitutional limits. AFP has more than 2,000,000 members, including members in all 50 states, and 34 state chapters and affiliates. For more information, visit www.americansforprosperity.org

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Carlton's Corner: Can Conservatives Trust the GOP?

The following is a statement from Richard Viguerie, chairman of Conservative HQ.com, regarding President Obama's speech to a joint session of Congress regarding employment:


"Congressional Republican leaders alienated most tea party and grass-roots conservatives when they made a debt ceiling deal with President Obama, instead of sticking with their own conservative allies to cut, cap, and balance the federal budget.

"Now, a little over a month after congressional Republicans made their deal with Obama, he suckered them into giving him a taxpayer-financed re-election speech to announce a more than $400 billion stimulus plan, effectively reneging on the debt ceiling deal he made back in August.

"If there was ever proof that the tea party and conservatives were right about the debt ceiling deal and that making spending deals with Obama is folly, this is it.

"Tea party and conservative activists are asking one question: Will congressional Republicans cave in to Obama's demands for more taxes and spending or will they redeem themselves partially by standing fast against another raid on the treasury by Obama and his Big Labor allies?"


Don't bet on it! Obama obviously has the GOP in his pocket! What a 'weak sister'!

Carlton

Thursday, August 11, 2011

WHAT WE ACCOMPLISHED IN THE CONGRESSIONAL DEBT LIMIT BATTLE

August 11, 2011

The battle over the $2.4 trillion increase in the debt limit is over--for now. The compromise package that passed both houses of Congress and was signed into law by Barack Obama increased the debt limit by the full amount he requested in exchange for illusory cuts in the federal budget over ten years.


The cuts are not actual reductions in spending from one year to the next. They are reductions in planned increases in spending. That's an old Washington trick to give cover to the politicians who want to make it look like they are really doing something to cut spending when they aren't.

The first round of so-called cuts was supposed to be $1 trillion over ten years. The specifics of where those "cuts" would be made were agreed to in the compromise.

An additional $1.6 trillion in cuts were contained in the compromise but they could not agree where those cuts would be made. So they followed the time-honored tradition in Washington of setting up a special committee made up of six Republicans and six Democrats--three Senators and three Representatives from each party.

This committee has been called the "super commission" because they have extraordinary powers granted to them by Congress. If they can agree on an itemized list of cuts, it will be presented to Congress for an up or down vote--no amendments allowed and no filibuster allowed.

If the super commission does not agree, or if their proposal is rejected, then a pre-determined formula for cutting spending by $1.6 trillion will kick in. It will be $800 billion of cuts in defense spending and $800 billion in cuts to Medicare.

The politicians who put this "poison pill" in the compromise knew full well that Congress would never go along with such cuts. It was placed there to box Republicans into a double bind. The Democrats will insist that taxes must be increased in order to avoid what they will call "Draconian" cuts in defense and Medicare.

This will force Republicans to choose between the "draconian" cuts or increasing taxes.

Republicans know that raising taxes now, in this economic climate would be a disaster.

The only bright spot in the compromise is the agreement to allow a vote in both houses of Congress on a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution. We can be justifiably proud of the fact that our grass roots lobbying campaign was responsible for members of Congress receiving over 250,000 faxes opposing an increase in the debt limit.

We inundated Congress with faxes causing Speaker Boehner to re-write his version of the compromise bill twice--each time making it stronger and more acceptable to conservatives.

We may not have stopped the increase in the debt limit but we did manage to help get the balanced budget amendment through in the final package.

The vote on the balance budget amendment will take place later this year, most likely in October. You will be hearing from us when that comes up for a vote and I hope every person on our roster will get involved in our grass roots lobbying campaign to get it passed through Congress.

OBAMA--DISENGAGED AND IN OVER HIS HEAD

It goes without saying that we oppose Obama for his radical left-wing agenda and for a laundry list of outrages.

But, quite apart from his ideology, Barack Obama has proven to be a colossal failure in the areas of competence and leadership.

He often seems disengaged from the crises swirling around him and more interested in the trappings and privileges of office than he is in being a leader.

You see him dancing at the White House, playing golf more than any President since Gerald Ford, taking off on expensive vacations, picking teams in basketball tournaments and more.

He is tone deaf, or just plain doesn't care, about the political implications of taking expensive vacations in the middle of a crisis.

And, when he does decide to take action on an issue, he inevitably makes the problem worse with his left wing prescriptions for every problem.

It is still a mystery why so many people ever thought that a man with zero executive experience and whose biggest deal in life was the purchase of his house, could walk right in to the Oval Office and manage the biggest and most important job in the world.

Would anyone with an ounce of brains hire a doctor, lawyer or accountant with no experience and expect them to do a great job? Would any board of directors anywhere hire an inexperienced management trainee to run the company? Of course not! But this is what happened in 2008 when the voters hired Barack Obama to be the President of the United States.

But don't count on the fact that he's been a total failure as President to guarantee that he won't get re-elected. He's got the media on his side and a powerful left wing establishment. He will be swimming in money and has a ruthless team of political pros running his campaign.

LIBERAL PATRICK LEAHY INTRODUCES BILL TO PROTECT ILLEGAL ALIEN MURDERERS

Just when you think you've seen the worst of the liberal mindset, something like this comes along and knocks you back into your chair.

At the behest of the Obama Administration Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, one of the most liberal members of the Senate, has introduced a bill called the "Consular Notification Compliance Act". The purpose of this bill was to stop the State of Texas from executing Humberto Leal, Jr., an illegal alien who had lived in the United States since he was two years old and was convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of 16-year old Adria Sauceda.

The Obama Administration attempted to pressure Texas Governor Rick Perry into halting the execution. Why? Because Humbero Leal, Jr., the convicted rapist and murderer had not been given the opportunity to consult with the Mexican Consulate when he was arrested for murder.

Understand, he didn't ask to be put in contact with the Mexican Consulate. But because it turned out that he was an illegal alien, Barack Obama and the U.S. Justice Department demanded that his execution be stopped because of this technicality.

Thank goodness Governor Perry refused to stop the execution and it took place on schedule.

The problem is that it has now come out that there are 50 other cases of Mexican citizens awaiting execution in the United States and they would be protected by the Leahy bill if it passes.

This bill must be defeated at all costs. We are carefully tracking the bill's progress and will keep you informed. When the time is right for a grass roots lobbying campaign, we hope we can count on your help in defeating this bill. Stay tuned.

From the "Republican Majority Campain 2012.

Sunday, August 7, 2011

How the Recent Debt Ceiling Law Affects Gun Owners

Friday, 05 August 2011 11:26

Well, the hot debate which dominated the nation for several weeks has finally simmered down. The debt ceiling deal is now law, and both sides of the political aisle are arguing over who won and who lost.


But one thing you won’t hear about -- in fact, we may not fully know the answer for several months -- is how much gun owners lost in this recent deal.

To quote Kentucky Senator Rand Paul from earlier this week:

"The Super Committee [created by the new law] limits the constitutional check of the filibuster by expediting passage of bills with a simple majority. The Super Committee is not precluded from any issue [including gun control], therefore the filibuster could be rendered moot."

MORE:  http://gunowners.org/a08052011.htm

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

More Democrats Call on Obama to Ignore Congress on Debt, Invoke 14th Amendment

House Democrats said Wednesday that President Barack Obama should invoke a little-known constitutional provision to prevent the nation from going into default if Congress fails to come up with a plan to raise the debt ceiling.


Rep. James Clyburn of South Carolina, a member of the Democratic leadership, said he told fellow Democrats that Obama should both veto any House GOP plan for a short-term extension of the debt ceiling and invoke the 14th amendment, which says that the validity of the nation’s public debt “shall not be questioned.”
CONTINUED:  http://www.theblaze.com/stories/democrats-call-on-obama-to-ignore-congress-on-debt-invoke-14th-amendment/

Monday, July 25, 2011

RSC Update: Still Only One Plan Solves the Problem

Monday, July 25, 2011



From the Chairman


Several weeks ago, S&P threatened to downgrade the U.S.’s AAA credit rating unless Washington comes up with a “credible solution” that saves at least $4 trillion and can be “enacted and maintained throughout the decade.” What does that mean exactly? It means any “deal” that relies on promises alone will not suffice because promises to cut spending later usually vanish into thin air. Only a Balanced Budget Amendment provides the permanence necessary to meet S&P’s standards. In other words, only the Cut, Cap, and Balance Act will protect our AAA credit rating and actually solve our debt problem.

A bipartisan “Gang of 234” in the House – with the support of two-thirds of Americans – approved the Cut, Cap, and Balance Act last week. Senate Democrats, however, used a procedural vote to halt debate on the measure. In the days since, the conversation has shifted to finding a “deal” to raise the debt ceiling rather than a solution to solve our debt problems. The credit rating agencies and the American public don’t just want a “deal” though. They want a real solution. Since Cut, Cap, and Balance is the only actual solution on the table, it’s the only plan I support.


49 out of the 50 states have to meet some form of balanced budget requirement. It’s time Washington was forced to do the same and finally live within its means.

God Bless,
Congressman Jim Jordan
Chairman, Republican Study Committee
1524 Longworth House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515
(202) 226-9717
rsc.jordan.house.gov
http://www.facebook.com/republicanstudycommittee

New Video…Exactly Who’s Pushing Who Off A Cliff In A Wheelchair???

This is really good!
http://randysright.wordpress.com/2011/07/25/new-video-exactly-whos-pushing-who-off-a-cliff-in-a-wheelchair/

If Debt Is The Enemy Then There Are Traitors Among Us

Liberty Extra


By Frank Salvato,

The so-called “debt ceiling default crisis” continues to loom, with enough Progressive-Leftist demagoguery in the air to choke a horse, or, in this case, kill an economy. I roll my eyes at the term “debt ceiling default crisis” because the honest man – an increasingly rare species in federal government – understands that there can only be a crisis should President Obama choose to create one. That said, Republicans, TEA Partiers and Conservatives are in danger of doing the right thing in refusing to enable more debt, but losing the public relations war to what amounts to the traitors among us due to chronic messaging impotency.

CONTINUED:  http://news.libertyextra.com/?v6nUWwvePCjAW4ekFTyNTg16dmt9GfyLv

Why the EPA Train Wreck Must Be Stopped!

Behind the scenes, while Washington and the United States focus on the debt crisis, President Obama’s EPA has been quietly implementing one of the most radical and costly policies of his administration. Ever since the failure of cap-and-trade, the administration has turned to the EPA to carry out its radical environmental agenda. Immediately after the 2010 election Obama was quoted saying “Cap-and-trade was just one way of skinning the cat; it was not the only way.” The EPA is in the process of completing and finalizing 30 major regulations and 170 major policy rules that would impose hundreds of billions of dollars of compliance costs on the economy, killing jobs and threatening the economic recovery. Because of the disastrous affects that the EPA’s new regulations will have on the already struggling economy, many have taken to calling the administration’s aggressive stance the “EPA train wreck.”


CONTINUED:  http://www.freedomworks.org/publications/end-of-the-line?src=nl

News Bulletin: White House says no to bipartisan agreement

According to the Washington Post, Boehner and Reid reached an agreement and the White House has said no..........
"If Obama is rejecting and presumably threatening to veto a bipartisan agreement that is reached between Boehner and Reid, it can only mean one thing. He wants a default on America’s debt."







MORE:  http://www.teapartynation.com/forum/topic/show?id=3355873%3ATopic%3A1144949&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic

Thursday, July 21, 2011

DICK MORRIS (EXCELLENT ANALYIS): How the Debt Debate Will Unfold

Here’s what’s going to happen:


1. The Senate leaders from both parties and President Obama will coalesce around the Gang of Six deal based on the recommendations of the Bowles-Simpson Deficit Reduction Commission.
2. After initially voicing reservations, House Speaker John Boehner and, perhaps, Majority Leader Eric Cantor will sign off on the deal in return for some unimportant modifications.
3. When the deal reaches the House floor, all hell will break loose and the rank and file Republicans will revolt en masse. Defying their leadership, they will reject the Gang of Six deal in caucus.
4. The House Democrats, who could provide the votes to pass the bill when their ranks are added to those Boehner-loyalists who back the proposal, will refuse to go along unless there are equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats voting for the Gang of Six proposal. Not wanting the albatross of passing the gang’s proposal as a Democratic plan, they will withhold the votes on the House floor for its passage. Boehner won’t bring it up for a vote.

CONTINUED:  http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/prediction-how-the-debt-debate-will-unfold/#more-3633

Thursday, July 14, 2011

CQ Roll Call Daily Briefing July 14, 2011: Today In Washington, DC

THE WHITE HOUSE: Obama is supposed to lay out what tax increases he’s after when the fifth straight day of Cabinet Room budget negotiations gets started at 4:15. After Reid, Pelosi, Durbin and Hoyer nod politely, the president will ask the Republican congressional leaders what extra revenue they have in mind. Once McConnell, Kyl, Cantor and, yes, Boehner all say “none,” the question will be how long the room falls silent before someone makes an awkward joke about walking out.

The rest of the president’s day also will be all about the budget: He’s taping another round of interviews with local TV stations (including NBC-4 here) at 2 to promote his point of view and will meet with Biden and Geithner at 3 to talk about preparations for a looming default in 20 days.

THE SENATE: Convened at 9:30 and is officially debating whether to debate its first spending bill of the year, which would allocate $59 billion for discretionary VA programs and $14 billion for military construction. Combined, it’s an 8 percent drop from what’s being spent this year. (Once mandatory veterans’ benefits are added in, the bill’s grand total goes up to $142 billion.) Some Republicans say it’s both inappropriate and pointless to deliberate any appropriations measure while the big budget numbers are totally up in the air. A vote to for the formal motion to proceed is nonetheless likely by suppertime.


THE HOUSE: Convenes at 10 and at noon will pick up debate on the energy and water appropriations bill. There’s only an outside chance the last amendment will be disposed of and the measure will be passed by 4 — after which members will be free to leave so they can either suit up for (or get a good seat at) the 50th annual Roll Call Congressional Baseball Game.

HE WALKED OUT. DID NOT. DID SO: To the viewers at home, that’s the sum and substance of what was accomplished yesterday by the two principal players (the president and the House majority leader) in what’s becoming the biggest fiscal policy crisis of the modern era.

If the usual adage holds true — that it’s always darkest before the dawn — then yesterday’s testy and impolitic confrontation will be remembered as the negotiating nadir. And there can be reason for optimism that moving the momentum-going-the-wrong-way talks to Camp David (and keeping all the leaking aides and the hungry-for-conflict press corps far from the cabins) might produce handshakes all around in only a couple of days. That’s apparently the president’s plan; he’s ready to invite the congressional Elite Eight for the weekend in the Catoctin Mountains so long as they're all still talking tomorrow. There’s also a chance he might ask the three whips to stay behind in order to further focus the talks. (Boehner's office this morning said the Speaker sees "no need" for a trip to Camp David.)


But if the fabled John McCain adage is true — that it’s always darkest before it’s completely black, as he likes to say — then everyone may as well spend what’s supposed to be a sunny and temperate Saturday and Sunday outside. That’s because the final two weekends before the Aug. 2 default deadline are sure to be spent indoors at the Capitol. Even if a genuine impasse arises tomorrow, and even if the tension and anxiety fester for more than a week, leaders and the rank-and-file alike will have little choice but to hunker down July 23 and 24, and again July 30 and 31, in the countdown-to-disaster rituals of crunching numbers, waiting for the quorum call bells to ring in the middle of the night, making predictable speeches and casting votes on measures designed by both parties for posturing.

HIS GAME TO LOSE: For today, though, the dynamic is that Obama has clearly got the upper hand — and the top Republicans are realizing as much, even if their idealistic and ideological rank-and-file are surely not there yet.

There can be no other reason why Cantor issued his statement lamenting that “nothing can pass the House,” then violated the presumed cone of silence among the big talkers by rushing back to the Capitol and offering reporters his melodramatic version of how yesterday’s talks ended. (In his telling, the president stormed out after warning, “Eric, don’t call my bluff.” In the White House’s version, leaked in response, Cantor interrupts the president three times.) And there can be little other interpretation for McConnell’s warning to the right (on Laura Ingraham’s radio show yesterday) that they’ll suffer the same fate as Gingrich did against Clinton in the 1995-96 government shutdowns if they try to persuade the public of the rightness of their cause after allowing a default: "You know, it's an argument he has a good chance of winning, and all of a sudden we have co-ownership of a bad economy," he said. "That is a very bad position going into an election."


If that’s the leadership consensus, then, they have just three options for cutting their losses and getting the budget battle behind them: They can reverse course on taxes and rush to accept the 4-to-1 ratio of spending cuts to revenue increases that Obama had been offering, before he raises the pressure by pressing for a 3-to-1 ratio that would mean much less pain for Democratic priorities. They can reverse course on the 1-to-1 ratio of deficit reduction to debt ceiling increase, accept only the 10 years worth of promised cuts both sides say they more or less agree on (assuming they can fine-tune that agreement so the price tag doesn’t keep oscillating between $1.5 trillion and $2 trillion) while allowing the debt ceiling to rise from $14.3 trillion to $16.7 trillion. Or they can rally behind the McConnell plan to give Obama that $2.4 trillion in borrowing power before the next election — and hope to come up with some way (and quickly) to pair it with an expedited, up-or-down process for moving legislation in the next year on deep spending cuts, tight enforcement caps and limited entitlement curbs.


CANTOR’S CALL: McConnell has already made clear his preference, and his idea continues to gain bipartisan momentum. Absent a miracle in the next 48 hours, Boehner will probably sign on (at least behind the scenes) by the start of next week. But the key will be Cantor. He will soon be pressed to decide for good how he wants to put his own career on the line. He can either keep taking the tea party’s side, and hope that makes him Speaker someday, or he can find a way to blink and hope his odds are better for remaining in the leadership indefinitely (meaning he’ll have to survive conservatives’ recriminations) than they are for being sacrificed in the next couple of months. Because if there’s a “huge financial calamity” after a default, the construct Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke used yesterday, then Cantor is positioned for now to be the principal political face of it — which either means his elevation within or his elimination from the GOP pantheon.

PART OF A BALANCED REGULATORY DIET: General Mills, ConAgra, Kellogg and several other big food companies are announcing an agreement today to limit their marketing and advertising of hundreds of sugary, salty, fatty and otherwise unhealthy products to children. The new industry standards are designed to replace stricter government-suggested guidelines spurned by the industry. (On the orders of Congress, earlier this year the Federal Trade Commission and several other agencies proposed a system for marketing junk food to kids, but the companies rejected them as too broad and limiting.)

Iowa’s Tom Harkin, the Democratic senator who wrote the language directing the government to develop the standards, labeled the industry alternative as inadequate. But they look to be the only viable option for now. The GOP majority in the House has rallied behind language in the FTC spending bill that would delay the government standards by ordering a cost-benefit study


PLAY BALL: After several weeks of early-morning practices, tonight’s Roll Call baseball game should feature some surprisingly decent play from the lawmakers — and some not-so-surprising partisan intensity (good natured, at least on the surface) both on the left side of the park (predictably, where the Democratic fans congregate behind their guys in the third-base dugout) and on the right side (where else but there for the GOP?). The first pitch is at Nationals Park at 7:05, and the forecast is for a beautifully cloudless and low-humidity evening. Proceeds from the $10 tickets ($134,000 last year) will benefit the Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Washington and the Washington Literacy Council.

The GOP leads the series, 33-16-1, and has captured 10 Roll Call trophies to the Democrats’ two. (A trophy goes to the party that wins three out of five annual games.) But the Democrats have won the past two and so have every incentive tonight, although one of last year’s stars, Anthony Weiner, is no longer available.

The starting pitchers haven’t been announced by the managers — Democrat Mike Doyle of Pennsylvania and Republican Joe Barton of Texas — but for the last few years they’ve been Illinois’ John Shimkus for the GOP and California’s Joe Baca for the Democrats. But lots of attention is being paid to a pair of freshman hurlers: Louisiana Democrat Cedric Richmond and Pennsylvania Republican Lou Barletta.


Now that Jim Bunning and John Ensign are gone, the senatorial contributions to the game are likely to be minimal. (Rand Paul is the only senator on either roster, and he’s in a suit in his program picture.)

— David Hawkings, editor

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

CATO INSTITUTE: What the Debt Ceiling Really Means

The clock is slowly ticking toward Aug. 2, the date on which the U.S. faces "fiscal Armageddon" — according to the Obama administration — unless Congress agrees to raise the debt ceiling. But would we?


The Obama administration, as well as much of the media and many economists, tend to equate failure to raise the debt limit with default. That's not precisely true.

READ THE REPORT HERE:  http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=13339&utm_source=Cato+Institute+Emails&utm_campaign=2735dff826-Cato_Today&utm_medium=email

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Obama tells Congressional leaders he will not sign short-term debt extension

07/07/11 09:05 PM ET


President Obama laid out three options for the size and scope of a deal he and congressional leaders could reach for cutting the deficit and raising the debt ceiling, but he made it clear that one option will meet his veto pen, according to a source familiar with the talks.


Meeting with a bipartisan, bicameral group of lawmakers at the White House Thursday morning, Obama said he would not sign a deal floated by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and other Republicans that would cut about $1 trillion in spending in exchange for a six or seven month extension of the debt ceiling.

MORE HERE:  http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/170313-obama-tells-congressional-leaders-he-will-not-sign-short-term-debt-extension