Americans Being Intentionally Replaced in Jobs With Immigrants Nationwide
This article and study supports ALIPAC's warning to America that Americans are being systematically replaced in our jobs, schools, health care facilities, homes, and ballot boxes as part of a coordinated plan by some elites to throw Americans out of power and into poverty or worse in our own nation.
We want to thank everyone once again that supported our 2010 campaign operations. We are very happy with our success despite several important races that did not go our way.
The evidence of election fraud is all over the place and many of our key activists and allied groups are looking into those matters as best we can. We believe that illegal aliens voted across America, especially in Nevada, on Nov 2. 2010.
Those of you that voted, paid attention to ALIPAC's endorsements, volunteered for campaigns, and donated to our operations and our candidates really made a great difference!
So many of you worked very hard and we want to make it very clear how much we appreciate your support and hard work!
Our major threat right now is that Harry Reid and the Democrats know that Comprehensive Immigration Reform Amnesty and Dream Act Amnesty are dead in the water for two years once the new members of the US House and Senate are sworn in during ceremonies in late January. ALIPAC hopes to set up an event for you to have the option of attending in DC for these historic events.
Members of Congress will reconvene for a few weeks starting around November 15, 2010. This short session between the elections and Christmas is called the 'Lame Duck' session.
Senator Harry Reid has made it very clear he plans to push for Amnesty again during the lame duck session in a desperate attempt to get amnesty through.
We hate to tell everyone this, but unfortunately Harry Reid and the other traitors do have a strong chance of passing Amnesty in the lame duck session.
But we have stopped them before several times and we will stop them again this time.
ALIPAC is an organization that now specializes in helping to stop Amnesty legislation on the state and federal level.
With your continued support and activism, we can hold them off until our new candidates can be sworn in. And if we can make it to that point, we will go on offense in the states and DC and by the time we are done, millions of illegal aliens will have left our nation!
Please rest up and get your affairs in order because the next round of political fighting will begin very soon!
Sincerely,
William Gheen and The ALIPAC Team
http://www.alipac.us/
Study: Foreign-born workers gain 656,000 jobs
By Morgan Lee
Friday, October 29, 2010 at 10:46 p.m.
Immigrants have gained more than 600,000 jobs since the official end of the Great Recession in June 2009, according to a newly released study.
Native-born workers fared far worse, shedding 1.5 million jobs, according to an analysis by the Pew Hispanic Center of U.S. Census Bureau and Department of Labor data.
Foreign-born workers picked up 656,000 jobs over the 12-month period, driving down that population's unemployment rate half a point to 8.7 percent. Immigrant workers make up 15.7 percent of the labor force.
The gains, however, were not nearly enough to make up for 1.1 million jobs lost among immigrants from second-quarter 2008 through second-quarter 2009. And immigrants experienced a sharp decline in median weekly earnings -- down 4.5 percent., compared to a loss of less than 1 percent for the native born.
"The unemployment rate for immigrants is still more than double the rate prior to the recession when it stood at 4.0 percent in the second quarter of 2007," the study said.
Released on Friday, the report was not able to separately identify illegal immigrants because that status was not recorded in the source data. It found that Hispanic immigrants experienced the largest drop in earnings of all ethnic and racial groups.
The report focused on the period from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009, when most of the job losses during the recession occurred, and the subsequent 12 months that marked the first year of recovery from the recession.
DISCUSS THIS EXPLOSIVE NEWS WITH OUR ONLINE ACTIVISTS AT...
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?/>
Showing posts with label immigrants. Show all posts
Showing posts with label immigrants. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
VIDEO: The Plan To Make Illegal Immigrants Your Masters
Please watch this video and understand how groups like SEIU hope to defeat ALIPAC and establish 'Progressive' rule for generations to come by passing Dream Act or Comprehensive Amnesty for illegal aliens.
Note: This was removed from Facebook--another attempt to shut down the truth!
http://www.alipac.us/article5732.html
Note: This was removed from Facebook--another attempt to shut down the truth!
http://www.alipac.us/article5732.html
Monday, August 30, 2010
Glenn Beck Rally
Glenn Beck Rally…Video Interviews Of Immigrants and Black Attendees
http://randysright.wordpress.com/2010/08/30/glenn-beck-rally-video-interviews-of-immigrants-and-black-attendees/
http://randysright.wordpress.com/2010/08/30/glenn-beck-rally-video-interviews-of-immigrants-and-black-attendees/
Saturday, August 21, 2010
SALUTE to Denmark ..
SALUTE to Denmark .. This could very well happen here on our Continent....
Susan MacAllen is a contributing editor for (FamilySecurityMatters.org) Salute the Danish Flag - it ' s a Symbol of Western Freedom By Susan MacAllen
In 1978-9 I was living and studying in Denmark . But in 1978 - even in Copenhagen, one didn ' t see Muslim immigrants.
The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new brand of socialist liberalism one in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929 - a system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other western nation at the time.
The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as free-thinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior educational system and a history of humanitarianism.
Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies - it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturalism. How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets -all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back to bite?
By the 1990 ' s the growing urban Muslim population was obvious - and its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious.
Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim-exclusive enclaves. As the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmark ' s liberal way of life, the Danes - once so welcoming - began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long-standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, in equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history.
An article by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedegaard, in which they forecasted, accurately, that the growing immigrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported:
'Muslim immigrants constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending. '
'Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark ' s 5..4 million people but make up a majority of the country ' s convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes. '
Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population.
A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane. '
'Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem '
'Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark ' s Muslim population grows large enough - a not-that-remote prospect.. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim. '
It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws.
An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and Canada: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden - before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa - who. as a teenager. had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers - and I wonder what she would say today.
In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years - one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration. Today Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe . ( Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of 'racism ' by liberal media across Europe - even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration.)
If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark ' s history, culture, and a Danish language test .
You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship.
You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark , you must both be over 24 years of age, and you won ' t find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to Denmark with you.
You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen . Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark , they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren ' t.
In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying: the government ' s welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system, as it existed, was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government. ' We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration ' .
'The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now, ' he said.
A large thorn in the side of Denmark ' s imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj.. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration, ' The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference, ' Hvilshoj says, ' There is an inverse correlation between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that come. ' And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in, ' In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights, < I>and freedom of speech. '
Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone.. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family ' s thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark.
The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time - in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce.
Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened.
Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law.
And meanwhile, Canadians clamor for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. As we in Canada look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our lan guage, appreciate our history .. we would do well to look to Denmark , and say a prayer for her future and f or our own..
If you agree with this article, then please pass it on..
Islam is no different to CANCER, they are working their way into every culture like a disease & if we don’t do something NOW (as described above) then all other cultures will be in serious trouble.
WW3 will be islam against the rest of the world
Susan MacAllen is a contributing editor for (FamilySecurityMatters.org) Salute the Danish Flag - it ' s a Symbol of Western Freedom By Susan MacAllen
In 1978-9 I was living and studying in Denmark . But in 1978 - even in Copenhagen, one didn ' t see Muslim immigrants.
The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new brand of socialist liberalism one in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929 - a system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other western nation at the time.
The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as free-thinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior educational system and a history of humanitarianism.
Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies - it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturalism. How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets -all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back to bite?
By the 1990 ' s the growing urban Muslim population was obvious - and its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious.
Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim-exclusive enclaves. As the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmark ' s liberal way of life, the Danes - once so welcoming - began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long-standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, in equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history.
An article by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedegaard, in which they forecasted, accurately, that the growing immigrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported:
'Muslim immigrants constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending. '
'Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark ' s 5..4 million people but make up a majority of the country ' s convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes. '
Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population.
A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane. '
'Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem '
'Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark ' s Muslim population grows large enough - a not-that-remote prospect.. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim. '
It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws.
An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and Canada: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden - before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa - who. as a teenager. had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers - and I wonder what she would say today.
In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years - one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration. Today Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe . ( Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of 'racism ' by liberal media across Europe - even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration.)
If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark ' s history, culture, and a Danish language test .
You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship.
You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark , you must both be over 24 years of age, and you won ' t find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to Denmark with you.
You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen . Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark , they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren ' t.
In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying: the government ' s welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system, as it existed, was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government. ' We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration ' .
'The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now, ' he said.
A large thorn in the side of Denmark ' s imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj.. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration, ' The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference, ' Hvilshoj says, ' There is an inverse correlation between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that come. ' And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in, ' In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights, < I>and freedom of speech. '
Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone.. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family ' s thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark.
The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time - in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce.
Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened.
Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law.
And meanwhile, Canadians clamor for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. As we in Canada look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our lan guage, appreciate our history .. we would do well to look to Denmark , and say a prayer for her future and f or our own..
If you agree with this article, then please pass it on..
Islam is no different to CANCER, they are working their way into every culture like a disease & if we don’t do something NOW (as described above) then all other cultures will be in serious trouble.
WW3 will be islam against the rest of the world
Friday, August 20, 2010
Comprehensive Amnesty Threat
NumbersUSA: Members of Congress Facing Immigration Questions During Summer Recess
Friday, August 20, 2010
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/news/august-20-2010/members-congress-facing-immigration-questions-during-summer-recess.html?jid=679011&lid=9&rid=4433&tid=1032626
Friday, August 20, 2010
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/news/august-20-2010/members-congress-facing-immigration-questions-during-summer-recess.html?jid=679011&lid=9&rid=4433&tid=1032626
Thursday, August 12, 2010
Reject Amnesty for Illegals by Bureaucratic Maneuvers
Reject Amnesty for Illegals by Bureaucratic Maneuvers
Whether one believes that states have the authority to control illegal immigration along their own borders or that this particular authority resides solely with Congress at the federal level granted by the Constitution, most American citizens would have no problem agreeing that the Obama Administration’s attempts to grant a blanket or backdoor amnesty by arbitrarily changing rules and procedures within the Immigration Service is just plain wrong. The executive branch is clearly without this kind of constitutional or congressional authority and yet, that is exactly what a new memo indicates may be happening soon.
Intent on reducing “the threat of removal” concerning “individuals present in the United States without authorization,” the Obama Administration’s Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) division was discovered to have an internal memo circulating outlining certain procedures that could reduce the deportation of illegals using tools described in the memo as "a non-legislative version of amnesty."
The memo offered the options of granting amnesty for those fleeing natural disasters in their own countries; expanding the use of “parole” for “urgent humanitarian reasons” or “significant public benefit;” and increasing the use of “deferred action,” which involves the government choosing not to pursue illegal immigrants and allowing them to remain in the United States for any or no reason.
The document admits that using deferred action will be controversial and expensive; Congress’ permission for funds to implement the measure would have to be sought, something that’s sure to meet with resistance from citizens, and even some congressmen.
The Obama Administration cautioned that the 11-page memo does not yet represent official policy, and the USCIS denies any backdoor or stealth amnesty program: “To be clear, DHS (Department of Homeland Security) will not grant deferred action or humanitarian parole to the nation's entire illegal immigrant population,” CIS spokesmen Christopher Bentley said. The use of the adjective “entire” is duly noted, making Bentley’s pronouncement more frightening, not less.
Senator Charles Grassley, (R-Iowa), whose office uncovered the memo and made it public, believes the whole idea is “a large-scale, de facto amnesty program.”
This is another blatant and tyrannical attempt by the current administration to provide amnesty for millions and millions of illegal aliens. Stealth amnesty sends the wrong message to potentially new citizens -- in America, it is okay to break the law. There will be no ill consequences, only rewards, encouraging others to take the same route, be they honest immigrants or terrorists. This type of pseudo social justice or false charity is destructive to society as a whole because it is without justice, both in the arbitrarily way it is being achieved and administered that makes a mockery out of the current system, and in the consequences suffered by working legal citizens who must carry the additional financial burden.
Paramount to retaining our representational form of government is the necessity of vigilance in upholding the Constitution. Please express to your public servants the necessity of working diligently toward convincing the Administration to abandon this approach to the illegal immigration problem by sending them an email or letter.
http://www.votervoice.net/Core.aspx?AID=972&IssueID=22628&atid=17634&siteid=0&App=GAC&target=true&isVisited=true&targetID=c247QgE4
Whether one believes that states have the authority to control illegal immigration along their own borders or that this particular authority resides solely with Congress at the federal level granted by the Constitution, most American citizens would have no problem agreeing that the Obama Administration’s attempts to grant a blanket or backdoor amnesty by arbitrarily changing rules and procedures within the Immigration Service is just plain wrong. The executive branch is clearly without this kind of constitutional or congressional authority and yet, that is exactly what a new memo indicates may be happening soon.
Intent on reducing “the threat of removal” concerning “individuals present in the United States without authorization,” the Obama Administration’s Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) division was discovered to have an internal memo circulating outlining certain procedures that could reduce the deportation of illegals using tools described in the memo as "a non-legislative version of amnesty."
The memo offered the options of granting amnesty for those fleeing natural disasters in their own countries; expanding the use of “parole” for “urgent humanitarian reasons” or “significant public benefit;” and increasing the use of “deferred action,” which involves the government choosing not to pursue illegal immigrants and allowing them to remain in the United States for any or no reason.
The document admits that using deferred action will be controversial and expensive; Congress’ permission for funds to implement the measure would have to be sought, something that’s sure to meet with resistance from citizens, and even some congressmen.
The Obama Administration cautioned that the 11-page memo does not yet represent official policy, and the USCIS denies any backdoor or stealth amnesty program: “To be clear, DHS (Department of Homeland Security) will not grant deferred action or humanitarian parole to the nation's entire illegal immigrant population,” CIS spokesmen Christopher Bentley said. The use of the adjective “entire” is duly noted, making Bentley’s pronouncement more frightening, not less.
Senator Charles Grassley, (R-Iowa), whose office uncovered the memo and made it public, believes the whole idea is “a large-scale, de facto amnesty program.”
This is another blatant and tyrannical attempt by the current administration to provide amnesty for millions and millions of illegal aliens. Stealth amnesty sends the wrong message to potentially new citizens -- in America, it is okay to break the law. There will be no ill consequences, only rewards, encouraging others to take the same route, be they honest immigrants or terrorists. This type of pseudo social justice or false charity is destructive to society as a whole because it is without justice, both in the arbitrarily way it is being achieved and administered that makes a mockery out of the current system, and in the consequences suffered by working legal citizens who must carry the additional financial burden.
Paramount to retaining our representational form of government is the necessity of vigilance in upholding the Constitution. Please express to your public servants the necessity of working diligently toward convincing the Administration to abandon this approach to the illegal immigration problem by sending them an email or letter.
http://www.votervoice.net/Core.aspx?AID=972&IssueID=22628&atid=17634&siteid=0&App=GAC&target=true&isVisited=true&targetID=c247QgE4
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
ACTION ALERT
ACTION ALERT…the mobile Mexican Consulate is going to pass out means of legal ID in North Carolina Illegal Aliens!!!
August 4, 2010 by randyedye
http://randysright.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/action-alert-the-mobile-mexican-consulate-is-going-to-pass-out-means-of-legal-id-in-north-carolina-illegal-aliens/#comment-10443
August 4, 2010 by randyedye
http://randysright.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/action-alert-the-mobile-mexican-consulate-is-going-to-pass-out-means-of-legal-id-in-north-carolina-illegal-aliens/#comment-10443
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
Sunday, July 25, 2010
Report Illegal Aliens!
ReportIllegals.com
ReportIllegals.com provides a quick and anonymous way to report illegal aliens (undocumented immigrants) and illegal employers to the proper U.S. government agencies. http://www.reportillegals.com/
ReportIllegals.com provides a quick and anonymous way to report illegal aliens (undocumented immigrants) and illegal employers to the proper U.S. government agencies. http://www.reportillegals.com/
Monday, July 19, 2010
Notes from the July 16th [2010] Governor Beverly Perdue’s Advisory Council on Hispanic / Latino Affairs
Concerned Citizens and Immigration Reformers,
Below is a brief of the first meeting of NC Governor Bev Perdue's Advisory Council on Hispanic/Latino Affairs, which appears to be setup in actuality to provide benefits to illegal immigrants and pander for votes. I think you will be disturbed with some of the details:
BACKGROUND INFO: The Hispanic/Latino population is estimated to be approximately 700,000 in North Carolina with one half or 350,000 of this group being illegal immigrants. The estimated total population of North Carolina is approximately 9.5 million. Therefore legal resident Hispanic/Latinos in North Carolina comprise less than 4% of the total population. So why do we need a special Governor’s Advisory Council for Hispanics/Latinos? We don’t have a Governor’s Advisory Council for unemployed citizens, which comprise 10% of the workforce. Is North Carolina Governor Beverly Perdue going to setup other race-based Advisory Councils?
Notes from the July 16th [2010] Governor Beverly Perdue’s Advisory Council on Hispanic / Latino Affairs
Ms. Gabriela Zabala is Director of the recently formed Governor’s Advisory Council on Hispanic/Latino Affairs. She mostly spoke during their first meeting in Raleigh on July 16th, which I attended along with Randy Dye, James, Maureen, and Frank.
This Advisory Council is to give advice to Governor Beverly Perdue on issues concerning the Hispanic/Latino community along with governmental policy recommendations.
Gabriela Zabala, Director of the Hispanic/Latino Advisory Council pointed out she was a senior member on Governor Beverly Perdue’s staff and appeared to brag about her access to Governor Perdue.
There are fifteen members on Governor Beverly Perdue’s Hispanic/Latino Advisory Council, one of whom is Wayne Cooper. Although Mr. Cooper is a citizen, he is an honorary consul of Mexico for North Carolina. It appears to be his only qualification for being on the Council. This member gives Mexico a “seat at the table” of an Advisory Council to provide policy recommendations to the Governor of North Carolina.
In addition to the fifteen members of the Governor’s Hispanic/Latino Advisory Council, there are ex officio members who mostly consist of the leadership of North Carolina’s major governmental departments such as Labor, Employment Security Commission, Department of Health and Human Services, Education, etc. So these state departmental staff personnel will be attending and presenting information to the Hispanic/Latino Advisory Council when they have meetings. Obviously this will give the Council “special access” to leadership within our North Carolina governmental departments. Also this Advisory Council will have the opportunity to lobby for privileges and benefits for illegal immigrants, but I expect only for Hispanic/Latino illegal immigrants, since this is an ethnic and race-based Advisory Council.
It was also stated that support staff for the Hispanic/Latino Advisory Council will be provided by the Governor’s Office.
It was mentioned that all Council members should abide by and obey all laws. Of course this is interesting, given several of the Advisory Council members have openly advocated for rights for illegal immigrants. So I can only suppose that obeying the law is open for interpretation.
Ms. Yvonne Pagan, another Advisory Council member, was quoted in the media as saying “in North Carolina we aren’t facing the same (immigration) problems as Arizona”. FACT: illegal immigration is costing the State of North Carolina over $1 billion per year [net cost] to incarcerate, educate, and medicate illegal immigrants and their dependents. I would suggest spending $1 billion per year of citizens’ money due to illegal immigration is a problem.
It was suggested that Credit Unions [specifics weren’t given] would be urged to provide funds to help Hispanics/Latinos open small businesses in categories such as landscaping, construction, and cleaning services.
With a smile on her face, Ms. Gabriela Zabala said she expected more money was coming to North Carolina from the Obama Administration for government services. She also said she would press for more Title 6 [Civil Rights Act] funds to provide interpreters.
ONE DOES NOT NEED CLAIRVOYANT POWERS TO DISCERN THE REAL PURPOSE OF GOVERNOR BEVERLY PERDUE’S ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISPANIC/LATINO AFFAIRS. CITIZENS AND LEGAL RESIDENTS WOULD NOT NEED A SPECIAL ADVISORY COUNCIL TO ACQUIRE GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES, AND IF THEY DID IT SHOULD NOT BE BASED ON ETHNICITY AND RACE. THIS ADVISORY COUNCIL IS AN EFFORT TO CURRY FAVOR WITH AN ETHNIC GROUP WITH THE INTENTION TO PROVIDE SPECIAL BENEFITS AND PRIVILEGES (TO MORE THAN LIKELY INCLUDE BENEFITS TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS) IN ORDER TO GAIN POLITICAL ADVANTAGE AND FUTURE VOTES.
Go to this link for a short video clip from Randy Dye:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU48rBIpPlg&feature=player_embedded
Regards,
Ron Woodard
Director
NC LISTEN
OFc: (919) 460-8156
www.nclisten.com
Below is a brief of the first meeting of NC Governor Bev Perdue's Advisory Council on Hispanic/Latino Affairs, which appears to be setup in actuality to provide benefits to illegal immigrants and pander for votes. I think you will be disturbed with some of the details:
BACKGROUND INFO: The Hispanic/Latino population is estimated to be approximately 700,000 in North Carolina with one half or 350,000 of this group being illegal immigrants. The estimated total population of North Carolina is approximately 9.5 million. Therefore legal resident Hispanic/Latinos in North Carolina comprise less than 4% of the total population. So why do we need a special Governor’s Advisory Council for Hispanics/Latinos? We don’t have a Governor’s Advisory Council for unemployed citizens, which comprise 10% of the workforce. Is North Carolina Governor Beverly Perdue going to setup other race-based Advisory Councils?
Notes from the July 16th [2010] Governor Beverly Perdue’s Advisory Council on Hispanic / Latino Affairs
Ms. Gabriela Zabala is Director of the recently formed Governor’s Advisory Council on Hispanic/Latino Affairs. She mostly spoke during their first meeting in Raleigh on July 16th, which I attended along with Randy Dye, James, Maureen, and Frank.
This Advisory Council is to give advice to Governor Beverly Perdue on issues concerning the Hispanic/Latino community along with governmental policy recommendations.
Gabriela Zabala, Director of the Hispanic/Latino Advisory Council pointed out she was a senior member on Governor Beverly Perdue’s staff and appeared to brag about her access to Governor Perdue.
There are fifteen members on Governor Beverly Perdue’s Hispanic/Latino Advisory Council, one of whom is Wayne Cooper. Although Mr. Cooper is a citizen, he is an honorary consul of Mexico for North Carolina. It appears to be his only qualification for being on the Council. This member gives Mexico a “seat at the table” of an Advisory Council to provide policy recommendations to the Governor of North Carolina.
In addition to the fifteen members of the Governor’s Hispanic/Latino Advisory Council, there are ex officio members who mostly consist of the leadership of North Carolina’s major governmental departments such as Labor, Employment Security Commission, Department of Health and Human Services, Education, etc. So these state departmental staff personnel will be attending and presenting information to the Hispanic/Latino Advisory Council when they have meetings. Obviously this will give the Council “special access” to leadership within our North Carolina governmental departments. Also this Advisory Council will have the opportunity to lobby for privileges and benefits for illegal immigrants, but I expect only for Hispanic/Latino illegal immigrants, since this is an ethnic and race-based Advisory Council.
It was also stated that support staff for the Hispanic/Latino Advisory Council will be provided by the Governor’s Office.
It was mentioned that all Council members should abide by and obey all laws. Of course this is interesting, given several of the Advisory Council members have openly advocated for rights for illegal immigrants. So I can only suppose that obeying the law is open for interpretation.
Ms. Yvonne Pagan, another Advisory Council member, was quoted in the media as saying “in North Carolina we aren’t facing the same (immigration) problems as Arizona”. FACT: illegal immigration is costing the State of North Carolina over $1 billion per year [net cost] to incarcerate, educate, and medicate illegal immigrants and their dependents. I would suggest spending $1 billion per year of citizens’ money due to illegal immigration is a problem.
It was suggested that Credit Unions [specifics weren’t given] would be urged to provide funds to help Hispanics/Latinos open small businesses in categories such as landscaping, construction, and cleaning services.
With a smile on her face, Ms. Gabriela Zabala said she expected more money was coming to North Carolina from the Obama Administration for government services. She also said she would press for more Title 6 [Civil Rights Act] funds to provide interpreters.
ONE DOES NOT NEED CLAIRVOYANT POWERS TO DISCERN THE REAL PURPOSE OF GOVERNOR BEVERLY PERDUE’S ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISPANIC/LATINO AFFAIRS. CITIZENS AND LEGAL RESIDENTS WOULD NOT NEED A SPECIAL ADVISORY COUNCIL TO ACQUIRE GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES, AND IF THEY DID IT SHOULD NOT BE BASED ON ETHNICITY AND RACE. THIS ADVISORY COUNCIL IS AN EFFORT TO CURRY FAVOR WITH AN ETHNIC GROUP WITH THE INTENTION TO PROVIDE SPECIAL BENEFITS AND PRIVILEGES (TO MORE THAN LIKELY INCLUDE BENEFITS TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS) IN ORDER TO GAIN POLITICAL ADVANTAGE AND FUTURE VOTES.
Go to this link for a short video clip from Randy Dye:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU48rBIpPlg&feature=player_embedded
Regards,
Ron Woodard
Director
NC LISTEN
OFc: (919) 460-8156
www.nclisten.com
Friday, July 16, 2010
House Democrats Insert Gay Rights into Immigration Debate
House Democrats Insert Gay Rights into Immigration Debate
By Jake Gibson
Published July 15, 2010--FoxNews.com
WASHINGTON -- House Democrats are trying to broaden support for immigration reform by reaching out to the gay and lesbian community with a provision in immigration legislation that would allow gay and lesbian Americans to bring foreign partners home to the United States.
Under current law, American citizens and other legal permanent residents can get a green card or immigrant visa for a spouse or immediate family members living abroad. However, the same rights do not extend to same-sex couples living in the country.
During a news conference on Capitol Hill Thursday, Democratic Reps. Jerrold Nadler of New York, Luis Gutierrez of Illinois and Mike Honda of California, among others, urged Congress to pass the Uniting American Families Act as part of a comprehensive immigration reform package this year.
"Right now too many same-sex, binational couples face an impossible choice," said Gutierrez, who sits on the House Judiciary Committee's immigration subcommittee, "to live apart or to break the law to be with partners, their families and children."
“Government should never engage in purposeless, gratuitous cruelty and we should stop it," Nadler said.
With no support from the GOP, the comprehensive immigration bill introduced by Gutierrez last December has stalled in the House. Republicans say this legislation won't help.
"These are creative people who just have the wrong philosophy," said Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, a member of the immigration subcommittee. "It's an alliance designed to grant amnesty."
"It tries to redefine traditional marriage. I can't support that," Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told Fox News. "If they're looking to truly reach out to conservatives and Republicans and do something in a bipartisan way, this isn't it."
The legislation appears to be part of an effort to strengthen support on the left, rather than the right, by targeting a constituency that has yet to be heard from in the immigration debate -- the lesbian, bisexual, gay and transgendered community.
"Last time around the pro-immigration side took us for granted. ... It is crucial to shore up the support of real genuine progressives who will pick up the phone and call their representatives," said Rachel Tiven of Immigration Equality, an organization that describes itself as one fighting for equal immigration rights for the LGBT community as well as HIV positive immigrants and their families.
Last month in Arizona, Phoenix' gay chamber of commerce urged national gay rights groups not to boycott the state over its impending immigration law that allows a crackdown by local police on illegals, saying the decision would hurt gay-friendly businesses. Proposed comprehensive immigration reform legislation in Congress is in part a reaction to criticism that the federal government has not done enough to resolve illegal immigration in the country.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/15/house-democrats-insert-gay-rights-immigration-debate/
By Jake Gibson
Published July 15, 2010--FoxNews.com
WASHINGTON -- House Democrats are trying to broaden support for immigration reform by reaching out to the gay and lesbian community with a provision in immigration legislation that would allow gay and lesbian Americans to bring foreign partners home to the United States.
Under current law, American citizens and other legal permanent residents can get a green card or immigrant visa for a spouse or immediate family members living abroad. However, the same rights do not extend to same-sex couples living in the country.
During a news conference on Capitol Hill Thursday, Democratic Reps. Jerrold Nadler of New York, Luis Gutierrez of Illinois and Mike Honda of California, among others, urged Congress to pass the Uniting American Families Act as part of a comprehensive immigration reform package this year.
"Right now too many same-sex, binational couples face an impossible choice," said Gutierrez, who sits on the House Judiciary Committee's immigration subcommittee, "to live apart or to break the law to be with partners, their families and children."
“Government should never engage in purposeless, gratuitous cruelty and we should stop it," Nadler said.
With no support from the GOP, the comprehensive immigration bill introduced by Gutierrez last December has stalled in the House. Republicans say this legislation won't help.
"These are creative people who just have the wrong philosophy," said Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, a member of the immigration subcommittee. "It's an alliance designed to grant amnesty."
"It tries to redefine traditional marriage. I can't support that," Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told Fox News. "If they're looking to truly reach out to conservatives and Republicans and do something in a bipartisan way, this isn't it."
The legislation appears to be part of an effort to strengthen support on the left, rather than the right, by targeting a constituency that has yet to be heard from in the immigration debate -- the lesbian, bisexual, gay and transgendered community.
"Last time around the pro-immigration side took us for granted. ... It is crucial to shore up the support of real genuine progressives who will pick up the phone and call their representatives," said Rachel Tiven of Immigration Equality, an organization that describes itself as one fighting for equal immigration rights for the LGBT community as well as HIV positive immigrants and their families.
Last month in Arizona, Phoenix' gay chamber of commerce urged national gay rights groups not to boycott the state over its impending immigration law that allows a crackdown by local police on illegals, saying the decision would hurt gay-friendly businesses. Proposed comprehensive immigration reform legislation in Congress is in part a reaction to criticism that the federal government has not done enough to resolve illegal immigration in the country.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/15/house-democrats-insert-gay-rights-immigration-debate/
Friday, July 9, 2010
AMERICAN THINKER: Are You an American, or Do You Just Live Here?
July 09, 2010
By Heather Carlton
Our country has become a country of Americans and other people who just live here. It pains me because I believe that this will change our nation from greatness to mediocrity.
I saw the flag wave as I stood at attention during the playing of our national anthem. It was simply sublime. I could see the tears well up in the eyes of my brother, a twenty-year Army veteran. I could feel the tears in my own eyes. The song pulled at the heartstrings of every member of our family. But not everyone in the crowd felt that way. Not everyone is moved by the ring of freedom.
There are six children in my family, and four of us have served our country. We have uncles who have served, and my grandfathers served. We have a long history of service. There are few citizens in this country who can't find a military member in their lineage. I say "citizens" because this is where I will clarify my statements.
People in our families have served and served with pride in their hearts. When the anthem plays, they remember loved ones and friends who died for this great country and feel proud to have known them. They remember that freedom is not free.
When I watch the news and I see that more of our soldiers have died on foreign ground, it chills me to the bone. It causes my heart to ache for the families and loved ones who have sacrificed it all for our freedom. It has been said that our country is great because "all gave some and some gave all." However, our country is not made up that way anymore.
What has happened to our country? We have become a country of entitlement. Liberals tell us we should allow the illegal immigrants to come here because they are just coming to feed their children, that if you were starving, you would come here, too. They say they are not hurting anyone.
I am here to tell you they are hurting someone. They are hurting us. When Ellis Island was receiving immigrants in record numbers, the people who came to this country came because they wanted to be Americans; they kissed the ground and prayed thanks to God for getting them to this great country and allowing them its vast opportunities. They had to endure great evils and hardships to get here, but they did so happily. They learned our language, and they wanted to assimilate into our culture. They loved America and became Americans.
Now, we are receiving record numbers of illegal immigrants. These people who do not respect our country enough to enter the country properly and legally. They do not care that we have laws, and they bring their own culture here. Many of them do not respect our flag; in fact, they burn it and spit on it in public, periodically. These people are not coming here to be a part of our great country. They want us to learn their language, they want our jobs, and they send money back to support their economy. They do not even plan to assimilate. They will take what they can from our country and leave when it is convenient. These people are weakening our country.
So I say to you: There is a difference between the people who live in America and the people who are Americans. If you are an American, then you should be truly outraged at what is being allowed to happen to our country! You should feel angry over how undeserving people are receiving the freedom and rights that you and your loved ones have fought for and died for. You should feel sad because so many people no longer remember that being an American is really about, and they are all right with settling for just living in America.
Ask yourself. Do I deserve to be here? Do I love this great nation which is unlike any other? Or do I simply reside here? Freedom is not free, and it is not an entitlement. Freedom is ours because of people who loved this country and loved the principles of this country so much that they gave everything they had.
Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/07/are_you_an_american_or_do_you_just_live_here.html at July 09, 2010 - 01:11:45 PM CDT
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/07/are_you_an_american_or_do_you_just_live_here.html
By Heather Carlton
Our country has become a country of Americans and other people who just live here. It pains me because I believe that this will change our nation from greatness to mediocrity.
I saw the flag wave as I stood at attention during the playing of our national anthem. It was simply sublime. I could see the tears well up in the eyes of my brother, a twenty-year Army veteran. I could feel the tears in my own eyes. The song pulled at the heartstrings of every member of our family. But not everyone in the crowd felt that way. Not everyone is moved by the ring of freedom.
There are six children in my family, and four of us have served our country. We have uncles who have served, and my grandfathers served. We have a long history of service. There are few citizens in this country who can't find a military member in their lineage. I say "citizens" because this is where I will clarify my statements.
People in our families have served and served with pride in their hearts. When the anthem plays, they remember loved ones and friends who died for this great country and feel proud to have known them. They remember that freedom is not free.
When I watch the news and I see that more of our soldiers have died on foreign ground, it chills me to the bone. It causes my heart to ache for the families and loved ones who have sacrificed it all for our freedom. It has been said that our country is great because "all gave some and some gave all." However, our country is not made up that way anymore.
What has happened to our country? We have become a country of entitlement. Liberals tell us we should allow the illegal immigrants to come here because they are just coming to feed their children, that if you were starving, you would come here, too. They say they are not hurting anyone.
I am here to tell you they are hurting someone. They are hurting us. When Ellis Island was receiving immigrants in record numbers, the people who came to this country came because they wanted to be Americans; they kissed the ground and prayed thanks to God for getting them to this great country and allowing them its vast opportunities. They had to endure great evils and hardships to get here, but they did so happily. They learned our language, and they wanted to assimilate into our culture. They loved America and became Americans.
Now, we are receiving record numbers of illegal immigrants. These people who do not respect our country enough to enter the country properly and legally. They do not care that we have laws, and they bring their own culture here. Many of them do not respect our flag; in fact, they burn it and spit on it in public, periodically. These people are not coming here to be a part of our great country. They want us to learn their language, they want our jobs, and they send money back to support their economy. They do not even plan to assimilate. They will take what they can from our country and leave when it is convenient. These people are weakening our country.
So I say to you: There is a difference between the people who live in America and the people who are Americans. If you are an American, then you should be truly outraged at what is being allowed to happen to our country! You should feel angry over how undeserving people are receiving the freedom and rights that you and your loved ones have fought for and died for. You should feel sad because so many people no longer remember that being an American is really about, and they are all right with settling for just living in America.
Ask yourself. Do I deserve to be here? Do I love this great nation which is unlike any other? Or do I simply reside here? Freedom is not free, and it is not an entitlement. Freedom is ours because of people who loved this country and loved the principles of this country so much that they gave everything they had.
Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/07/are_you_an_american_or_do_you_just_live_here.html at July 09, 2010 - 01:11:45 PM CDT
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/07/are_you_an_american_or_do_you_just_live_here.html
Friday, July 2, 2010
Friday, June 25, 2010
Thursday, June 24, 2010
The Cloward-Piven Plan ... How to Overwhelm the System
by WAYNE ALLYN ROOT: Overwhelm the system
Barach Obama is no fool. He is not incompetent. To the contrary, he is brilliant. He knows exactly what he's doing. He is purposely overwhelming the U.S. economy to create systemic failure, economic crisis and social chaos -- thereby destroying capitalism and our country from within.
Barack Obama is my college classmate (Columbia University, class of '83). As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Obama is following the plan of Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia University. They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the system with government spending and entitlement demands. Add up the clues below. Taken individually they're alarming. Taken as a whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that desperately needs government for survival ... and can be counted on to always vote for bigger government. Why not? They have no responsibility to pay for it.
-- Universal health care. The health care bill had very little to do with health care. It had everything to do with unionizing millions of hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000 new IRS agents (who will join government employee unions). Obama doesn't care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will add trillions to the national debt. What he does care about is that it cements the dependence of those 30 million voters to Democrats and big government. Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless spending bill in the middle of a depression?
-- Cap and trade. Like health care legislation having nothing to do with health care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming. It has everything to do with redistribution of income, government control of the economy and a criminal payoff to Obama's biggest contributors. Those powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like GE, which owns NBC, MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support everything Obama wants. They will kick-back hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions to Obama and the Democratic Party to keep them in power. The bonus is that all the new taxes on Americans with bigger cars, bigger homes and businesses helps Obama "spread the wealth around."
-- Make Puerto Rico a state. Why? Who's asking for a 51st state? Who's asking for millions of new welfare recipients and government entitlement addicts in the middle of a depression? Certainly not American taxpayers. But this has been Obama's plan all along. His goal is to add two new Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a million loyal Democratic voters who are dependent on big government.
-- Legalize 12 million illegal immigrants. Just giving these 12 million potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm the system and bankrupt America. But it adds 12 million reliable new Democrat voters who can be counted on to support big government. Add another few trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children, food stamps, free medical, education, tax credits for the poor, and eventually Social Security.
-- Stimulus and bailouts. Where did all that money go? It went to Democrat contributors, organizations (ACORN), and unions -- including billions of dollars to save or create jobs of government employees across the country. It went to save GM and Chrysler so that their employees could keep paying union dues. It went to AIG so that Goldman Sachs could be bailed out (after giving Obama almost $1 million in contributions). A staggering $125 billion went to teachers (thereby protecting their union dues). All those public employees will vote loyally Democrat to protect their bloated salaries and pensions that are bankrupting America. The country goes broke, future generations face a bleak future, but Obama, the Democrat Party, government, and the unions grow more powerful. The ends justify the means.
-- Raise taxes on small business owners, high-income earners, and job creators. Put the entire burden on only the top 20 percent of taxpayers, redistribute the income, punish success, and reward those who did nothing to deserve it (except vote for Obama). Reagan wanted to dramatically cut taxes in order to starve the government. Obama wants to dramatically raise taxes to starve his political opposition.
With the acts outlined above, Obama and his regime have created a vast and rapidly expanding constituency of voters dependent on big government; a vast privileged class of public employees who work for big government; and a government dedicated to destroying capitalism and installing themselves as socialist rulers by overwhelming the system.
Add it up and you've got the perfect Marxist scheme -- all devised by my Columbia University college classmate Barack Obama using the Cloward and Piven Plan.
Barach Obama is no fool. He is not incompetent. To the contrary, he is brilliant. He knows exactly what he's doing. He is purposely overwhelming the U.S. economy to create systemic failure, economic crisis and social chaos -- thereby destroying capitalism and our country from within.
Barack Obama is my college classmate (Columbia University, class of '83). As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Obama is following the plan of Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia University. They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the system with government spending and entitlement demands. Add up the clues below. Taken individually they're alarming. Taken as a whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that desperately needs government for survival ... and can be counted on to always vote for bigger government. Why not? They have no responsibility to pay for it.
-- Universal health care. The health care bill had very little to do with health care. It had everything to do with unionizing millions of hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000 new IRS agents (who will join government employee unions). Obama doesn't care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will add trillions to the national debt. What he does care about is that it cements the dependence of those 30 million voters to Democrats and big government. Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless spending bill in the middle of a depression?
-- Cap and trade. Like health care legislation having nothing to do with health care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming. It has everything to do with redistribution of income, government control of the economy and a criminal payoff to Obama's biggest contributors. Those powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like GE, which owns NBC, MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support everything Obama wants. They will kick-back hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions to Obama and the Democratic Party to keep them in power. The bonus is that all the new taxes on Americans with bigger cars, bigger homes and businesses helps Obama "spread the wealth around."
-- Make Puerto Rico a state. Why? Who's asking for a 51st state? Who's asking for millions of new welfare recipients and government entitlement addicts in the middle of a depression? Certainly not American taxpayers. But this has been Obama's plan all along. His goal is to add two new Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a million loyal Democratic voters who are dependent on big government.
-- Legalize 12 million illegal immigrants. Just giving these 12 million potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm the system and bankrupt America. But it adds 12 million reliable new Democrat voters who can be counted on to support big government. Add another few trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children, food stamps, free medical, education, tax credits for the poor, and eventually Social Security.
-- Stimulus and bailouts. Where did all that money go? It went to Democrat contributors, organizations (ACORN), and unions -- including billions of dollars to save or create jobs of government employees across the country. It went to save GM and Chrysler so that their employees could keep paying union dues. It went to AIG so that Goldman Sachs could be bailed out (after giving Obama almost $1 million in contributions). A staggering $125 billion went to teachers (thereby protecting their union dues). All those public employees will vote loyally Democrat to protect their bloated salaries and pensions that are bankrupting America. The country goes broke, future generations face a bleak future, but Obama, the Democrat Party, government, and the unions grow more powerful. The ends justify the means.
-- Raise taxes on small business owners, high-income earners, and job creators. Put the entire burden on only the top 20 percent of taxpayers, redistribute the income, punish success, and reward those who did nothing to deserve it (except vote for Obama). Reagan wanted to dramatically cut taxes in order to starve the government. Obama wants to dramatically raise taxes to starve his political opposition.
With the acts outlined above, Obama and his regime have created a vast and rapidly expanding constituency of voters dependent on big government; a vast privileged class of public employees who work for big government; and a government dedicated to destroying capitalism and installing themselves as socialist rulers by overwhelming the system.
Add it up and you've got the perfect Marxist scheme -- all devised by my Columbia University college classmate Barack Obama using the Cloward and Piven Plan.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
