Thursday, September 15, 2011

RANDY'S RIGHT ALERT: Here it is Folks…SCOTUS NATURAL BORN CITIZEN PRECEDENCE… Minor vs Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875)

Here it is folks, the precedence everyone in DC says doesn’t exist! Established by Minor vs Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875)which specifically defines an Article 2 Section 1 natural-born citizen as a person born in the US to parents who are citizens.

Therefore, Obama – according to US Supreme Court precedent – is not eligible to be President.

Go to SCOTUS NATURAL BORN CITIZEN PRECEDENCE

This link must be blasted to every Congressman, Senator, SCOTUS justice, and DOJ. If nothing is done as a result, it will be then known that there is no longer any doubt that they are ALL in collusion to subvert the Constitution, therefore all guilty of misprision.

Natural Born Citizen
US SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT STATES THAT OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE …

The title of this article is correct. After having completed a more thorough review of the relevant US Supreme Court cases discussing the Constitution’s natural-born citizen clause, I have discovered precedentwhich states that a natural-born citizen is a person born in the jurisdiction of the US to parents who are citizens. Read that again. I said precedent, not dicta. The precedent holds that Obama is not eligible to be President of the United States.

Up until the publication of this report today, all discussion of the natural-born citizen issue (from both sides of the argument) agreed there had never been a precedent established by the US Supreme Court, and that the various cases which mentioned the clause did so in “dicta”.

Dicta are authoritative statements made by a court which are not binding legal precedent.
CONTINUE READING:  http://randysright.wordpress.com/2011/09/15/her-it-is-folks-scotus-natural-born-citizen-precedence-minor-vs-happersett-88-u-s-162-1875/

No comments:

Post a Comment