15 Reasons Why America Must Embrace
Bible-Friendly Policy to Survive the 3rd Millennium (pt. 2)
During the
current Egyptian unrest, where popular opinion helped depose democratically
elected Islamist President Mohamed Morsi, we do well to reflect on America’s
values and mission in the world. Should
America span the globe to spread unrest in unpopular regimes, then empower
whatever type of government seems to sprout up, afterward? Or should America
reserve its power and influence to help establish American Revolution-styled
states?
In fact, one desperately hopes it is screamingly obvious that if the US
helps create any government opposed to our values, that we are helping
establish our future enemies. When the
Muslim Spring movement arrived amongst much fanfare, the liberal elites
heralded this as Obama’s foreign policy coming of age. Muslim Spring is the
Barack inspired doctrine offer to aid resisters against Middle East dictators,
helping any rebels despite whatever beliefs they espoused. How wise it was,
they exclaimed, to direct wars from far-away, to keep American troops out of
harm’s Nway, and lead from behind!
Other
more realistic analysts declared the notion of tossing aside foreign leaders,
some strongly pro-American, a recipe for
disaster. (see Obama Support of
“Arab Spring”‚ÄîClear Marxist Values Leading to Sharia Law Revolution)
Further, the idea that America would look the other way while Muslim Shariah
Law directed governments were established across the zone, with US aid, seemed
surreal.
In short order, the governments of Egypt, Libya, Yemen and now Syria
were part of a movement replacing secular tyrannies with what pompous leftists
claimed would be an American Revolution type undertaking. Instead, as seen in
Egypt, a functional, and US friendly secular tyranny was replaced by a radical
Muslim dictatorship imposing Shariah Law, inserted by the Muslim Brotherhood
radicals who engineered the coup.
No comments:
Post a Comment